Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differences between experienced and anticipatory distress.

C J Sowa, A N Barsanti

    Journal of Clinical Psychology
    |September 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Incorporating stress management into athletic injury rehabilitation.

    Journal of athletic training·2006
    Same author

    Gender differences in rating stressful events, depression, and depressive cognition.

    Journal of clinical psychology·1984
    Same author

    Comparative efficacy of biofeedback and stress inoculation for stress reduction.

    Journal of clinical psychology·1983
    See all related articles

    Distress ratings differ significantly between anticipated and experienced life events. Experienced events are more reliable for assessing stress, depression, and anxiety, with women reporting higher distress levels than men.

    Area of Science:

    • Psychology
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Stress Research

    Background:

    • Distress assessment is crucial for understanding mental health.
    • Previous research has not fully differentiated between anticipated and experienced stress.
    • Life events significantly impact psychological and somatic well-being.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine differences in distress ratings between anticipated and experienced life events.
    • To investigate the predictive validity of perceived versus experienced stress on psychological symptoms.
    • To explore gender differences in distress perception and experience.

    Main Methods:

    • A study involving 168 participants.
    • Comparison of distress ratings for anticipated versus experienced life events.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of symptoms including stress, depression, anxiety, and somatic discomfort across occupational, social, and familial domains.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant discrepancies were found between perceived and experienced aversion across various life situations.
    • Experienced events more accurately predicted symptoms of stress, depression, anxiety, and somatic discomfort.
    • Women reported significantly higher distress ratings compared to men.

    Conclusions:

    • Experienced life events are more robust indicators for distress assessment in clinical settings.
    • The concept of anticipated or perceived stress may warrant re-evaluation.
    • Gender differences in distress reporting must be considered when interpreting psychological measures.