Related Experiment Videos
Response cost, reinforcement, and children's Porteus Maze qualitative performance
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
|September 1, 1986
Summary
Response cost and positive reinforcement significantly reduced errors in the Porteus Maze Test for fourth graders. These interventions showed generalized effects, improving overall performance beyond targeted errors.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Educational Psychology
- Child Development
Background:
- The Porteus Maze Test assesses planning and problem-solving skills.
- Understanding factors influencing maze test performance is crucial for cognitive development research.
- Previous studies have explored various feedback mechanisms on cognitive tasks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of different experimental conditions on Porteus Maze Test performance.
- To determine if response cost, positive reinforcement, or negative verbal feedback affect qualitative errors.
- To assess the generalized effects of these interventions on cognitive task performance.
Main Methods:
- Sixty fourth-grade children participated in the study.
- A baseline Porteus Maze Test was administered.
- A second series was given under control, response cost, positive reinforcement, or negative verbal feedback conditions.
Main Results:
- Response cost and positive reinforcement significantly decreased qualitative errors compared to the control group.
- Negative verbal feedback did not lead to significant error reduction.
- Error reduction was observed in both targeted and nontargeted errors, indicating generalized effects.
Conclusions:
- Response cost and positive reinforcement are effective in improving performance on the Porteus Maze Test.
- These interventions demonstrate generalized effects, enhancing overall cognitive control.
- Findings suggest practical applications for educational and therapeutic interventions targeting problem-solving skills.