Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2025

A Rat Carotid Artery Pressure-Controlled Segmental Balloon Injury with Periadventitial Therapeutic Application
Published on: July 9, 2020
Exploring the role of endovascular interventions in blunt carotid and vertebral artery trauma
Walter L Biffl1, Matthew Castelo1, Imad S Dandan1
1Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, 9888 Genesee Ave., LJ601, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Insights
Endovascular interventions (EI) and antithrombotic therapy (AT) for blunt carotid and vertebral artery injuries (BCI/BVI) show limited stroke prevention. Thrombectomy may improve outcomes after stroke, necessitating further research.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Neurology
- Trauma Care
Background:
- The efficacy of endovascular interventions (EI) for blunt carotid and vertebral artery injuries (BCI and BVI) remains unclear.
- Current treatment strategies require further definition to optimize patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of EI versus antithrombotic therapy (AT) for BCI and BVI.
- To provide data for future prospective studies on managing these injuries.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of patient records from 2017-2022 at a Level I trauma center.
- Inclusion of data on injury type, treatment received, and patient outcomes, with stroke as the primary outcome measure.
Main Results:
- 106 injuries (74 BVI, 32 BCI) in 96 patients were analyzed; 13 EI were performed (4 therapeutic, 9 prophylactic).
- Stroke occurred in 12 patients, with 6 having undergone EI. Stroke rates were low for grade IV BVI with both EI and AT.
- Thrombectomy following stroke demonstrated a 100% improvement in neurologic function in 4 patients.
Conclusions:
- The majority of strokes occurred before initiation of preventive therapy.
- Neither AT nor EI guarantees complete stroke prevention; thrombectomy shows potential for improving post-stroke neurologic outcomes.
- A prospective, multicenter study is essential to definitively establish optimal management strategies.
Background:
The role of endovascular interventions (EI) for blunt carotid and vertebral artery injuries (BCI and BVI) is poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of EI compared with antithrombotic therapy (AT) to inform future prospective study.
Methods:
Retrospective review (2017-2022) of records at a Level I trauma center to determine injury, treatment, and outcome information. Primary outcome was stroke.
Results:
96 patients suffered 106 injuries (74 BVI, 32 BCI). 12 patients underwent 13 EI- 4 therapeutic, 9 prophylactic. Stroke occurred in 12 patients- 6 who had EI. In grade IV BVI, stroke rates are low with both EI and AT. Thrombectomy after stroke improved neurologic function in 4 (100%) of 4 patients.
Conclusions:
Most strokes occur prior to preventive therapy. Neither AT nor EI is 100% effective in preventing stroke. Thrombectomy may improve neurologic outcomes after stroke. Prospective multicenter study is imperative.
Related Concept Videos
Arteries of the Head and Neck
The internal carotid arteries supply blood to the anterior portion of the cerebrum. They enter the...
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
The Arch of Aorta
Encircling the heart, the coronary arteries form a ring-like structure before...
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

