Related Experiment Videos
Visit frequency for controlled essential hypertension: general practitioners' opinions
The Journal of Family Practice
|October 1, 1986
Summary
General practitioners vary widely in how often they see patients with essential hypertension. Factors like diastolic pressure, patient age, and treatment decisions influence follow-up frequency, impacting patient care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- General Practice
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Essential hypertension management involves regular patient monitoring.
- General practitioners (GPs) play a crucial role in managing hypertension in primary care settings.
- Variability in clinical practice patterns can influence patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the frequency of patient visits for uncomplicated essential hypertension among South Glamorgan GPs.
- To identify factors influencing the decision to treat and the follow-up interval for hypertensive patients.
- To explore the impact of physician opinion variability on hypertension management.
Main Methods:
- A survey was conducted among 50 randomly selected general practitioners in South Glamorgan.
- GPs were asked about their treatment and follow-up frequency for patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension.
- Data analysis focused on identifying correlations between patient characteristics, treatment decisions, and visit frequency.
Main Results:
- The decision to treat essential hypertension was influenced by diastolic pressure, patient age, and sex.
- Follow-up visit frequency ranged from bi-weekly to annually, averaging 14.8 weeks.
- Pretreatment diastolic pressure, patient age, and treatment status significantly affected follow-up intervals.
Conclusions:
- Significant variability exists in GP follow-up intervals for essential hypertension.
- Follow-up frequency is influenced by patient-specific factors and clinical decisions.
- Understanding practice variations is crucial for assessing their impact on patient outcomes and optimizing care processes.