Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Comparison of an Initial Risk-Based Testing Strategy vs Usual Testing in Stable Symptomatic Patients With Suspected
Pamela S Douglas1, Michael G Nanna2, Michelle D Kelsey1
1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
A new strategy using coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) and risk scores improved clinical efficiency for stable chest pain patients. This approach reduced unnecessary catheterizations without compromising safety, warranting further investigation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Current guidelines recommend initial coronary computed tomography angiography (cCTA) for stable chest pain, but concerns exist regarding overtesting and unnecessary catheterizations.
- A modified cCTA strategy aims to enhance clinical efficiency compared to usual testing (UT).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a precision strategy (PS) incorporating risk stratification and cCTA with selective CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR-CT) against usual testing (UT) for stable chest pain.
- To assess the impact of this modified cCTA strategy on clinical efficiency and patient safety.
Main Methods:
- A pragmatic randomized clinical trial involved 2103 patients with stable chest pain across 65 North American and European sites.
- Patients were randomized to either the precision strategy (PS) or usual testing (UT).
- The PS group used the PROMISE minimal risk score for deferred testing in low-risk patients, with others undergoing cCTA and selective FFR-CT. UT involved site-selected stress testing or catheterization.
Main Results:
- The primary endpoint (clinical efficiency and safety composite) occurred in 4.2% of the PS group versus 11.3% in the UT group (HR, 0.35).
- Clinical efficiency was significantly higher in the PS group, with substantially lower rates of catheterization without obstructive coronary artery disease (2.6% vs 10.2%).
- The composite safety endpoint of death or myocardial infarction (MI) was similar between groups, though nonfatal MI rates were higher in the PS group (1.2% vs 0.5%).
Conclusions:
- An initial diagnostic approach using quantitative risk stratification, deferred testing for minimal-risk patients, and cCTA with selective FFR-CT for others significantly improved clinical efficiency in stable chest pain patients.
- While the strategy demonstrated higher clinical efficiency, further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings, particularly regarding safety outcomes.
- Increased use of lipid-lowering and antiplatelet medications was observed in the PS group at one year.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview