Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery in Children Through Novel Biomarkers and Enhanced Localization
Published on: September 20, 2024
Ictal crying in epileptic seizures and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: What are the hints to differentiate them?
Filiz Azman Iste1, M Ilker Yon1, F Irsel Tezer1
1Hacettepe University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Ankara, Turkey.
Insights
Ictal crying (IC) is rare in epileptic seizures (ES) but not exclusive to psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). Differentiating IC between ES and PNES is crucial for accurate diagnosis and treatment, with potential links to nondominant temporal lobe epilepsy.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Epileptology
Background:
- Ictal crying (IC) is a rare seizure manifestation, predominantly observed in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES).
- Misattributing IC solely to PNES can impede accurate diagnosis and management of epileptic seizures (ES).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the frequency and characteristics of IC in both ES and PNES.
- To identify distinguishing semiological features of IC between ES and PNES.
- To analyze the etiology, semiology, treatment, and outcomes of patients with IC in ES.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring data over 20 years.
- Inclusion of patients with documented IC, defined by crying with or without weeping and subjective sadness.
- Comparison of demographic, clinical, and video-EEG data between ES and PNES groups.
Main Results:
- Six patients with ES and 37 with PNES presented with IC.
- Patients with ES and IC had higher antiepileptic drug (ASM) loads and longer disease durations compared to PNES.
- PNES patients exhibited longer seizure duration, longer crying components, later onset of crying, quicker post-seizure responsiveness, and crying during wakefulness.
Conclusions:
- IC is not pathognomonic for PNES and can occur in ES, necessitating careful differentiation.
- Specific semiological differences in IC presentation can aid in distinguishing between ES and PNES.
- Nondominant temporal lobe involvement may be associated with IC in ES, suggesting potential localization.
Objectives:
Ictal crying (IC) is a quite rare semiological manifestation of epileptic seizures (ESs) and it has been mostly reported in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs). However, labeling IC as a pathognomonic sign of PNES can be harmful. We first aimed to investigate IC frequency in ES and PNES and highlight the differences of IC between ES and PNES. Secondly, we aimed to analyze etiology, detailed semiology, treatment options, and outcome of patients with IC in ES in more detail.
Methods:
We retrospectively screened all video-EEG monitoring unit reports from Hacettepe University Hospitals' Epilepsy Center over a 20-year period (1996-2017) for the diagnosis of IC. We included the patients with IC who had at least one documented seizure. Patients who had IC with both facial expression and vocalization compatible with crying with or without weeping and subjective feeling of sadness, were included in the study. We classified patients with IC as ES and PNES. Demographic, historical, clinical, neuroimaging, electrophysiological parameters, video-EEG data, treatment options, and prognosis of all patients were recorded. Demographic, clinical, and video-EEG data were compared between ES and PNES.
Results:
During the study period, 1983 patients were investigated. Six patients (all female) with ES and 37 patients (33 female) with PNES were identified. When we compared patients with PNES and ES with IC, the number of ASMs taken and duration of disease were significantly higher in patients with ES than PNES. Longer duration of seizure, longer duration of crying component, late onset of crying component in seizure, early responsiveness after seizure, not occurring during sleep, accompanied by eye closure and weeping, were found significantly higher in patients with PNES. Besides, if we analyze ES group in more detail, all had medical treatment refractory focal epilepsy and two of them whose IC was seen as an early semiological manifestation of their seizures had good outcome after nondominant anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL)+amygdalohippocampectomy (AH). However, three patients had various cortical lesions apart from temporal lobe on MRI and one patient had focal epilepsy with frontal lobe semiology with negative MRI.
Conclusion:
Although the most common etiology for IC is PNES and it is rarely seen in ES, it can be harmful to label ictal crying as a pathognomonic sign for PNES. We proposed that there are some semiological differences in terms of IC between PNES and ES. These differences may help to distinguish IC in PNES and ES in daily practice. Moreover, it can be speculated that nondominant temporal lobe involvement may be associated with IC in ES.
More Related Videos
10:22Interictal High Frequency Oscillations Detected with Simultaneous Magnetoencephalography and Electroencephalography as Biomarker of Pediatric Epilepsy
Published on: December 6, 2016
04:51Pupillary Response as Assessment of Effective Seizure Induction by Electroconvulsive Therapy
Published on: April 11, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Seizures: Classification
Seizures are typically classified into two main categories: focal and generalized seizures.
Focal Seizures
Focal seizures originate from specific regions of the brain. These seizures are further sub-classified into two types:
Arteries of the Lower Limbs
Various factors can trigger epilepsy, including genetic factors, brain damage, metabolic causes, and unknown etiology. Diagnosis of epilepsy involves electroencephalography (EEG), which...
Electroconvulsive Therapy