Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.0K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.0K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.0K
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

598
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
598
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

2.8K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
2.8K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

147
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
147
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.5K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Randomized communication nudges to increase primary care engagement among Medicaid enrollees in Maine.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same author

Dental Coverage Through Medicaid Managed Care vs Fee-for-Service.

JAMA health forum·2026
Same author

The importance and challenge of comparing stroke care, utilization and outcomes in Medicare Advantage and Fee-for-Service Medicare: a narrative review and vision for the future.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research·2026
Same author

Community-Entry Home Health Made Up Nearly Half Of Home Health Episodes And Spending In Traditional Medicare, 2017-21.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same author

Lamina cribrosa shape in non-human primates is different from that of humans.

Experimental eye research·2025
Same author

Medigap Regulations Provide Protections For Beneficiaries, Especially After Health Shocks, But May Raise Premiums.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 18, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

What Difference Does a Health Plan Make? Evidence from Random Plan Assignment in Medicaid.

Michael Geruso1, Timothy J Layton2, Jacob Wallace3

  • 1UT-Austin and NBER.

American Economic Journal. Applied Economics
|August 25, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Lower-spending managed care plans reduce medical services, including high-value care, negatively impacting patient health and satisfaction. Consumer choice drives higher spending, complicating government contracting and cost control.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

1.4K
Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
08:33

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 18, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant
05:18

Author Spotlight: Improving Radiation Therapy Access with Radiation Planning Assistant

Published on: October 6, 2023

1.4K
Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research
08:33

Author Spotlight: Methodologies and Advancements of Chronic Pain Management Research

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Managed care policy
  • Healthcare utilization

Background:

  • Managed care plans are intended to control costs through utilization management.
  • Variations in spending exist across plans even with identical cost-sharing structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of plan-specific spending differences on healthcare utilization, beneficiary outcomes, and consumer choice.
  • To analyze the relationship between managed care plan spending and market share.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized quasi-experimental design leveraging random assignment of beneficiaries to managed care plans.
  • Analyzed plan-specific spending, service utilization, beneficiary satisfaction, and health outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Enrollment in lower-spending plans reduced overall spending by at least 25%, primarily through reduced service quantities.
  • Lower-spending plans decreased provision of both low-cost and high-value care, leading to worse beneficiary satisfaction and health.
  • A 10% increase in plan spending correlated with a 40% increase in market share.

Conclusions:

  • Plan-specific spending variations significantly influence healthcare delivery and patient well-being, not just "wasteful" spending.
  • Consumer preferences align with higher-spending plans, posing challenges for government cost-containment strategies.
  • Findings have critical implications for government contracting and managing healthcare program expenditures.