Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2025

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Minimal-Access Coronary Revascularization: Past, Present, and Future
Rushmi Purmessur1, Tharushi Wijesena1, Jason Ali1
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0AY, UK.
Insights
Minimal-access cardiac surgery, including MIDCAB, HCR, and TECAB, is gaining traction. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to definitively prove its superiority over traditional open-heart surgery.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Techniques
Background:
- Minimal-access cardiac surgery is increasingly favored by cardiologists and patients.
- Coronary artery revascularization via minimally invasive approaches is globally adopted.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the historical evolution of minimal-access coronary revascularization.
- To outline current techniques and challenges in minimal-access coronary surgery.
Main Methods:
- Historical review of minimal-access coronary revascularization.
- Discussion of contemporary approaches: MIDCAB, HCR, and TECAB.
- Analysis of nomenclature and methodological variations.
Main Results:
- Minimal-access coronary revascularization has a long history, evolving into modern techniques like MIDCAB, HCR, and TECAB.
- Significant variations in terminology and approaches complicate comparisons.
- Proponents report patient advantages, but robust evidence is limited.
Conclusions:
- Minimal-access coronary revascularization represents a growing field with potential patient benefits.
- Demonstrating superiority over open techniques requires more rigorous evidence, particularly from randomized controlled trials.
- Ongoing trials are crucial for the future validation and widespread adoption of these techniques.
Abstract:
Minimal-access cardiac surgery appears to be the future. It is increasingly desired by cardiologists and demanded by patients who perceive superiority. Minimal-access coronary artery revascularisation has been increasingly adopted throughout the world. Here, we review the history of minimal-access coronary revascularization and see that it is almost as old as the history of cardiac surgery. Modern minimal-access coronary revascularization takes a variety of forms-namely minimal-access direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB), hybrid coronary revascularisation (HCR), and totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB). It is noteworthy that there is significant variation in the nomenclature and approaches for minimal-access coronary surgery, and this truly presents a challenge for comparing the different methods. However, these approaches are increasing in frequency, and proponents demonstrate clear advantages for their patients. The challenge that remains, as for all areas of surgery, is demonstrating the superiority of these techniques over tried and tested open techniques, which is very difficult. There is a paucity of randomised controlled trials to help answer this question, and the future of minimal-access coronary revascularisation, to some extent, is dependent on such trials. Thankfully, some are underway, and the results are eagerly anticipated.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

