Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2025

08:13
A Novel Bioreactor for High Density Cultivation of Diverse Microbial Communities
Published on: December 25, 2015
17.1K
Assessment of Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrading with MBR Implementation
1Research and Education Centre "Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment", Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 26, Yaroslaskoye Highway, 129337 Moscow, Russia.
Membranes
|August 25, 2023
Summary
Wastewater treatment plant upgrades are impacted more by pollutant concentration than flow rate. Membrane sludge separation significantly reduces tank volume but increases energy costs for aeration.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Water Treatment Technologies
Background:
- Wastewater treatment plants require modernization due to wear and changing influent conditions.
- Accurate flow and pollutant data are crucial for effective treatment design and operation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the modernization of secondary wastewater treatment facilities under reduced flow and increased pollutant concentration.
- To compare the impact of pollutant concentration versus flow rate on treatment tank volumes.
- To assess the benefits and drawbacks of membrane sludge separation in wastewater treatment upgrades.
Main Methods:
- Manual calculations and CapdetWorks software were used for treatment facility design.
- The study focused on upgrading from organic pollutant removal to nutrient and organic pollutant removal.
- Calculations compared tank volumes and energy costs for gravity separation versus membrane separation.
Main Results:
- Pollutant concentration significantly influences required tank volumes more than flow rate changes, especially for enhanced treatment.
- Membrane sludge separation can reduce tank volumes by 1.5-2.5 times compared to gravity separation.
- While membrane separation lowers capital costs, it increases specific aeration energy consumption.
Conclusions:
- Wastewater treatment plant modernization must account for increased pollutant loads.
- Membrane technology offers substantial volume reduction benefits but necessitates higher energy input for aeration.
- The choice between gravity and membrane separation involves balancing capital cost savings against operational energy expenses.

