Atrial fibrillation progression after cryoablation vs. radiofrequency ablation: the CIRCA-DOSE trial

Jason G Andrade1,2,3, Marc W Deyell2, Paul Khairy3

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel St 10th Floor, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.

European Heart Journal
|August 25, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Contact-force radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) showed a lower rate of progression to persistent AF compared to cryoballoon ablation. This study highlights the importance of ablation energy type in managing AF progression.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Electrophysiology
  • Medical Devices

Background:

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a progressive disorder linked to severe health outcomes.
  • Catheter ablation aims to modify AF progression mechanisms.
  • The impact of different ablation energies on AF progression remains unevaluated in randomized trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of contact-force radiofrequency (CF-RF) ablation versus cryoballoon ablation (CRYO-4 and CRYO-2) in preventing the progression of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to persistent atrial tachyarrhythmia.

Main Methods:

  • 346 patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF were randomized into three groups: CF-RF ablation, 4-minute cryoballoon ablation, or 2-minute cryoballoon ablation.
  • Implantable cardiac monitors were used for follow-up.
  • The primary endpoint was the first episode of persistent atrial tachyarrhythmia.

Main Results:

  • No patients (0.0%) in the CF-RF group developed persistent atrial tachyarrhythmia, compared to 7.0% in the CRYO-4 group and 4.3% in the CRYO-2 group (P = .03).
  • Recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (≥30s) and reduction in AF burden were similar across all groups.
  • Median follow-up was 944 days.

Conclusions:

  • Catheter ablation using radiofrequency energy was associated with a significantly lower rate of progression to persistent atrial fibrillation.
  • These findings suggest that the type of ablation energy may influence the long-term management of atrial fibrillation progression.
Abstract