Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2025

A Model of Chronic Nutrient Infusion in the Rat
Published on: August 14, 2013
A Comparison of Slow Infusion Intermittent Feeding versus Gravity Feeding in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled
Funda Yavanoglu Atay1, Ozlem Bozkurt2, Suzan Sahin3
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, 34764 Istanbul, Türkiye.
Insights
Slow infusion feeding (SIF) may be a better option for preterm infants at risk of feeding intolerance. This method reduced gastric residuals and non-per-oral status compared to intermittent bolus feeding (IBF).
Area of Science:
- Neonatology
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Infant Nutrition
Background:
- Ensuring adequate growth in preterm infants relies on the timely transition to full enteral feeding.
- Feeding intolerance is a common complication in preterm infants, potentially hindering nutritional support and growth.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of slow infusion feeding (SIF) versus intermittent bolus feeding (IBF) in facilitating the transition to full enteral feeding in preterm infants.
- To evaluate the impact of these feeding methods on feeding intolerance and related outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized controlled study involving preterm infants (gestational age 24 + 0/7 to 31 + 6/7 weeks).
- Infants were randomized to either SIF (infusion pump over 1 hour every 3 hours) or IBF (gravity-based via syringe, 10-30 min).
- Primary outcomes included time to full enteral feeding and incidence of feeding intolerance.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in the time to achieve full enteral feeding between SIF and IBF groups (p = 0.20).
- The SIF group demonstrated significantly fewer instances of gastric residual volume exceeding 50% (p = 0.01).
- Infants in the SIF group experienced a significantly shorter duration of non-per-oral (NPO) status (p = 0.03).
Conclusions:
- Slow infusion feeding (SIF) is a suitable alternative for preterm infants experiencing or at high risk of feeding intolerance.
- SIF may offer advantages in managing gastric residuals and reducing periods of nil by mouth.
- This feeding strategy supports nutritional goals in vulnerable preterm populations.
Background:
The transition to full enteral feeding is important for ensuring adequate growth in preterm infants.
Aims:
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two different intermittent feeding methods on the transition to full enteral feeding in preterm infants.
Study Design:
A prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted in a neonatology and perinatology center.
Subjects:
Preterm infants with a gestational age between 24 + 0/7 and 31 + 6/7 were included in this study. They were divided into two groups: the SIF (slow infusion feeding) group and the IBF (intermittent bolus feeding) group. In the SIF group, feed volumes were administered over one hour using an infusion pump through an orogastric tube, with feeding occurring every three hours. The IBF group received enteral feeding using a gravity-based technique with a syringe through an orogastric tube, completed within 10 to 30 min.
Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome was the achievement of full enteral feeding and the occurrence of feeding intolerance.
Results:
A total of 103 infants were enrolled in the study (50 in SIF and 53 in IBF). The time to achieve full enteral feeding did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.20). The SIF group had significantly fewer occurrences in which gastric residual volume exceeded 50% (p = 0.01). Moreover, the SIF group had a significantly shorter duration of non-per-oral (NPO) status than the IBF group (p = 0.03).
Conclusions:
It is our contention that the use of the SIF method as an alternative feeding method is appropriate for infants with feeding intolerance and those at high risk of feeding intolerance.
More Related Videos
06:19Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development
Published on: April 19, 2024
00:04A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Infusion
The model illustrates the decrease in plasma drug concentration from the central compartment with a specific equation. It shows that under steady-state conditions, the drug's input rate...
One-Compartment Open Model for IV Bolus Administration: Estimation of Clearance
In the one-compartment open model for intravenous (IV) bolus administration, clearance is estimated by dividing the elimination rate by the plasma drug concentration. This equation leverages the elimination rate constant and the apparent...