Pediatric Palliative Care: Insights into Assessment Tools andReview Instruments
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2025

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Simonetta Papa1, Anna Mercante2, Luca Giacomelli1
1Polistudium SRL, 20121 Milan, Italy.
Insights
Assessing needs and outcomes in pediatric palliative care (PPC) is crucial. While many tools exist, few are validated for PPC, necessitating their use even without full validation to improve patient care.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Palliative Care
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Clinical Assessment Tools
Background:
- Pediatric palliative care (PPC) requires robust needs and outcome assessment for optimal patient and family support.
- Challenges in PPC assessment include patient numbers, disease heterogeneity, cognitive impairment, and child development.
- Standardized tools for adult palliative care exist, but a comprehensive assessment for PPC is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and discuss existing tools for assessing needs and outcomes in pediatric palliative care (PPC).
- To provide an educational overview for healthcare providers on available PPC assessment instruments.
- To highlight the need for validated tools in PPC and encourage their adoption.
Main Methods:
- Narrative review of current literature on assessment tools in pediatric palliative care.
- Classification of identified tools into eligibility, needs assessment, and care assessment categories.
- Discussion of the applicability and validation status of reviewed instruments.
Main Results:
- Several instruments are available for various dimensions of PPC assessment.
- Two primary eligibility tools identified: PaPaS Scale and ACCAPED Scale questionnaire.
- Many needs assessment and quality of life tools lack specific PPC validation and are better suited for research.
Conclusions:
- Tools for assessing PPC service quality appear readily applicable.
- Development and validation of new, specific PPC tools are recommended.
- Healthcare providers should utilize available tools in PPC practice, prioritizing patient well-being over complete validation.
Abstract:
The proper assessment of needs and outcomes in pediatric palliative care (PPC) is imperativeto ensure the best possible service to patients and families. However, given the multidimensionalnature of PPC, the low number of patients in this setting, the heterogeneity of diseases, the presenceof cognitive impairment in many patients, and the physiological development of children, outcomescan be complex and difficult to measure. Consequently, in this context, the use of standardizedand validated tools to assess the needs of children and families, to assess symptom severity, andto estimate the quality of PPC service represent a current need. Even if efforts have been made tostandardize approaches and tools for palliative care in adults, to our knowledge, a similar comprehensiveassessment of PPC has not yet been conducted to date. This narrative review provides anoverview and discusses the evaluation of tools currently applied in PPC, with an educational intentfor healthcare providers. We found that several instruments are available to assess different dimensionsof PPC. We proposed a classification into eligibility tools, patient and family needs assessmenttools, and care assessment tools. At present, two main eligibility tools exist, the PaPaS Scale and theACCAPED Scale questionnaire. Most of the tools for patient and family needs assessment have notbeen specifically validated in the PPC setting, and many may be more readily applied in researchsettings rather than in daily practice. Similar considerations can be made for tools assessing QoL,while tools assessing PPC service quality seem to be easily applied. Efforts to develop new specifictools and validate existing ones are undoubtedly advocated. However, in the patient's best interest,PPC healthcare providers should start using available tools, regardless of their validation status.
More Related Videos
06:04Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Continuing Care
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Cancer Survival Analysis
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Ethical Dilemmas II
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...