Microstructure of TiAl Capsules Processed by Electron Beam Powder Bed Fusion Followed by Post-Hot Isostatic Pressing

The microstructures of intermetallic γ-titanium aluminide (TiAl) alloys are subjected to a certain degree of Al evaporation when processed by electron beam powder bed fusion (EB-PBF). The magnitude of the Al-loss is mainly correlated with the process parameters, and highly energetic parameters produce significant Al evaporation. The Al-loss leads to different microstructures, including the formation of inhomogeneous banded structures, thus negatively affecting its mechanical performance. For this reason, the current work deals with creating EB-PBFed TiAl capsules with the inner part produced using only the pre-heating step and melting parameters with low energetic parameters applying high beam speed from 5000 to 3000 mm/s. This approach is investigated to reduce the Al-loss and microstructure inhomogeneity after hot isostatic pressing (HIP). The results showed that the HIP treatment effectively densified the capsules obtaining a relative density of around 100%. After HIP, the capsules produced with the inner part melted at 3000 mm/s presented a lower area shrinkage (around 6.6%) compared to the capsules produced using only the pre-heating step in the core part (around 20.7%). The different magnitudes of shrinkage derived from different levels of residual porosity consolidated during the HIP process. The HIPed capsules exhibited the presence of previous particle boundaries (PPBs), covered by α₂ phases. Notably, applying low energetic parameters to melt the core partially eliminates the particles' surface, thus reducing the PPBs formation. In this case, the capsules melted with low energetic parameters (3000 mm/s) exhibited α₂ concentration of 3.5% and an average size of 13 µm compared to the capsules produced with the pre-heating step in the inner part with an α₂ around 5.7% and an average size around 23 µm. Moreover, the Al-loss of the capsules was drastically limited, as determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis. More in detail, the capsules produced with the pre-heating step reported an atomic percentage of Al of 48.75, while using low energetic melting parameters led to 48.36. This result was interesting, considering that the massive samples produced with standard parameters (so more energetic ones) revealed atomic Al percentage from 48.04 to 47.70. Finally, the recycled small particles showed a higher fraction of α₂ phases with respect to the coarse particles, as determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD).