Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2025

07:53
Author Spotlight: Advancing 3D Modeling for Enhanced Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Nodules in Early-Stage Lung Cancer
Published on: October 13, 2023
1.5K
Deep learning-based detection and classification of multi-leaf collimator modeling errors in volumetric modulated
Sae Nakamura1, Madoka Sakai2,3, Natsuki Ishizaka4
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata Neurosurgical Hospital, Nishi-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, Japan.
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|August 26, 2023
Summary
Deep learning models can detect and classify multi-leaf collimator (MLC) modeling errors in VMAT, but accuracy varies with error magnitude and treatment site. Gamma analysis was ineffective for error detection.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy Technology
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Volumetric Modulated Radiation Therapy (VMAT) relies on precise multi-leaf collimator (MLC) modeling parameters.
- Errors in MLC parameters like transmission factor (TF) and dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) can impact treatment accuracy.
- Accurate detection of these errors is crucial for patient safety and effective cancer treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and assess deep learning (DL) models for detecting and classifying MLC modeling parameter errors (TF and DLG) in VMAT.
- To evaluate the performance of DL models in distinguishing between error-free plans and plans with specific TF or DLG errors.
- To investigate the models' ability to classify the sign (positive or negative) of TF and DLG errors.
Main Methods:
- Utilized 33 clinical VMAT plans for prostate and head-and-neck cancers in a phantom study.
- Introduced artificial errors (±10%, 20%, 30%) to TF and DLG parameters within the treatment planning system.
- Applied Gaussian filters to mimic measurement dose maps and generated dose difference maps for DL model training and evaluation.
Main Results:
- DL models successfully detected and classified TF and DLG errors with high accuracy for certain filter types ().
- Accuracy decreased significantly for other filter types () and varied with error magnitude and treatment site.
- Models accurately classified the sign of errors for specific filter types ( and 1.0), while gamma analysis failed to detect errors.
Conclusions:
- Deep learning models offer a feasible approach for detecting and classifying TF and DLG errors in VMAT dose distributions.
- Model performance is influenced by error magnitude, treatment site, and the degree of simulated measurement dose.
- Further research can refine DL models for robust error detection in clinical VMAT applications.

