Comparison of three techniques in bladder stone surgery: Which technique is more effective and safe?

In our study, we aimed to compare the success and complication rates of percutaneous cystolithotripsy (PCCL), transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL), and Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy in the surgery of bladder stones that occurred due to various reasons.

Patients diagnosed with single or multiple bladder stones with long axis larger than 2 cm, resulting for various reasons, were included in ou study. Sizes of the stones, cystolithotripsy and discharge times, catheter removal times, complications observed, and the visual pain scale (VPS) were retrospectively evaluated separately from the surgical techniques implemented for accompanying patients and their data.

TUCL (group 1) was implemented in 40, PCCL (group 2) was implemented in 44, and transurethral Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy (group 3) was implemented in 30 of the 121 patients included in the study. The bladder stone long axe group 1 average was 3,7 cm (2,2-5,3), group 2 average was 3,74 cm (2,1-5,1), and group 3 average was 3,7 cm (2,3-4,7). Urethral stricture evolved in two patients who underwent TUCL. A statistically significant difference was observed on behalf of PCCL in terms of operation time. There was significance in the Ho: YAG laser cystolithotripsy group in comparison with VPS scores. No significant differences were found in terms of age, stone size, urethral catheter removal times, and discharge times. The average follow-up time was 6 months.

Although all three methods were quite successful in bladder stone surgery, average cystolithotripsy times were significantly low in the PCCL technique. Thinking that the most common cause of bladder stone is BPH, it is stated that the suprapubic inserted tube ease the bladder drainage during transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P). In this way, the duration of the most common accompanying surgeries is shortened and performed more safely.