Assessment of Family Satisfaction with Remote Communication for Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: An Observational...

During the pandemic, traditional family meetings were replaced by remote telecommunications. We assessed the families' satisfaction with these communications using a survey-based questionnaire.

The study involved 20-minute telephonic surveys conducted with the family member who was updated during the hospitalization of the patient. A thematic-based questionnaire with responses on a scale of 5 ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied was used. The responses were dichotomized into bad and good reports for analysis.

A total of 196 patients were eligible. Only 154 patients' family representatives consented to the study. The frequency and content of the telephonic updates were satisfactory. The bad report was assigned to 5% of families only. Among features assessing empathy of communication providers, the satisfaction rate was much higher with 3% of families alone providing a bad report. The response was significantly biased against the final outcome of the patient with poor review often provided by relatives of patients who had succumbed to the illness. The dissatisfaction rate was much higher, above 12% for the trust of communication and ICU visitation. However, the final outcome of the patient did not affect the trust in the information conveyed by the physician.

This study highlights several drawbacks in the communication strategy during the second surge of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). The final outcome of the patient was the key decisive factor for the response to most of the questionnaire. Sustained faith in communication by the physician despite the final outcome of the patient, re-emphasizes the need for emotional connection and training for breaking bad news.

Varghese MP, Selwyn T, Nair S, Samuel S, Chacko B, Pichamuthu K. Assessment of Family Satisfaction with Remote Communication for Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: An Observational Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(8):537-544.