Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 16, 2026

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
Published on: November 1, 2019
Assessment of Prediction Tasks and Time Window Selection in Temporal Modeling of Electronic Health Record Data: a
Sarah Pungitore1, Vignesh Subbian2,3
1Program in Applied Mathematics, Department of Mathematics, 617 N Santa Rita Ave, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.
Abstract:
Temporal electronic health record (EHR) data are often preferred for clinical prediction tasks because they offer more complete representations of a patient's pathophysiology than static data. A challenge when working with temporal EHR data is problem formulation, which includes defining the time windows of interest and the prediction task. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review that assessed the definition and reporting of concepts relevant to temporal clinical prediction tasks. We searched PubMed® and IEEE Xplore® databases for studies from January 1, 2010 applying machine learning models to EHR data for patient outcome prediction. Publications applying time-series methods were selected for further review. We identified 92 studies and summarized them by clinical context and definition and reporting of the prediction problem. For the time windows of interest, 12 studies did not discuss window lengths, 57 used a single set of window lengths, and 23 evaluated the relationship between window length and model performance. We also found that 72 studies had appropriate reporting of the prediction task. However, evaluation of prediction problem formulation for temporal EHR data was complicated by heterogeneity in assessing and reporting of these concepts. Even among studies modeling similar clinical outcomes, there were variations in terminology used to describe the prediction problem, rationale for window lengths, and determination of the outcome of interest. As temporal modeling using EHR data expands, minimal reporting standards should include time-series specific concerns to promote rigor and reproducibility in future studies and facilitate model implementation in clinical settings.
Supplementary Information:
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41666-023-00143-4.

