Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Psychosurgery01:30

Psychosurgery

78
Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
78

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying patients at elevated risk of stroke after transcarotid artery revascularization.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026
Same author

Building the future of surgical peer review: A new partnership between SURGERY and the Association of Women Surgeons.

Surgery·2026
Same author

Readmissions within 90 days in patients with diabetic foot ulcers undergoing soft tissue reconstruction: risk factor analysis.

Journal of wound care·2026
Same author

Failed endovascular intervention before open bypass does not worsen outcomes for chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026
Same author

Association of the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification with long-term outcomes for complex diabetic foot wounds.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026
Same author

Utilization of the stop-short technique in transcarotid artery revascularization is associated with intraoperative common carotid artery dissection.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon
10:29

Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon

Published on: January 6, 2011

113.6K

How to Review a Surgical Scientific Paper: A Guide for Critical Appraisal.

Stephanie H Greco1, Catherine H Davis2, Caitlin W Hicks3

  • 1From the Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.

Annals of Surgery Open : Perspectives of Surgical History, Education, and Clinical Approaches
|August 28, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Surgeons need training to effectively peer-review scientific manuscripts. This guide offers structured support for conducting quality reviews of surgical papers, enhancing scientific literature integrity.

Keywords:
critiquereviewsurgical paper

More Related Videos

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
04:45

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Published on: May 10, 2021

3.8K
A Detailed Protocol for Physiological Parameters Acquisition and Analysis in Neurosurgical Critical Patients
05:01

A Detailed Protocol for Physiological Parameters Acquisition and Analysis in Neurosurgical Critical Patients

Published on: October 17, 2017

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon
10:29

Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon

Published on: January 6, 2011

113.6K
Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
04:45

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Published on: May 10, 2021

3.8K
A Detailed Protocol for Physiological Parameters Acquisition and Analysis in Neurosurgical Critical Patients
05:01

A Detailed Protocol for Physiological Parameters Acquisition and Analysis in Neurosurgical Critical Patients

Published on: October 17, 2017

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Education
  • Scientific Publishing
  • Academic Medicine

Background:

  • The increasing volume of scientific manuscripts necessitates greater surgeon involvement in peer review.
  • A lack of formal training hinders surgeons' ability to provide unbiased and constructive manuscript reviews.
  • Effective peer review is crucial for maintaining the quality and integrity of surgical literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a structured guide for surgeons performing peer reviews of surgical manuscripts.
  • To enhance the quality and consistency of peer reviews within surgical academic publishing.
  • To support the Association of Women Surgeons Publications Committee's initiative to improve manuscript evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a structured review framework based on best practices in scientific publishing.
  • Incorporation of guidelines for assessing study design, methodology, results, and discussion.
  • Emphasis on providing constructive, unbiased, and actionable feedback to authors.

Main Results:

  • The paper presents a comprehensive, step-by-step guide for surgical peer review.
  • The structured approach aims to standardize the review process and improve feedback quality.
  • The guide addresses key components of a manuscript, from introduction to conclusion.

Conclusions:

  • Structured guidance is essential for surgeons to conduct high-quality peer reviews.
  • Improving the peer-review process strengthens the foundation of surgical scientific knowledge.
  • Adoption of this guide can lead to more rigorous and impactful surgical publications.