Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Suprasellar lesions: evaluation with MR imaging.

M G Karnaze, K Sartor, J D Winthrop

    Radiology
    |October 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Functional magnetic resonance imaging for cranial neuronavigation: methods for automated and standardized data processing and management. A technical note.

    The neuroradiology journal·2013
    Same author

    Medical implications of atomic energy.

    Journal - Michigan State Medical Society·2010
    Same author

    Angiographic diagnosis of expanding intracranial lesions by vascular displacement.

    Radiology·2010
    Same author

    The teaching of radiology.

    Radiology·2010
    Same author

    Intracranial angiography; the diagnosis of vascular lesions.

    Journal of neurosurgery·2010
    Same author

    Cataloging X-ray experiences.

    Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1896)·2010

    Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers superior characterization of suprasellar lesions compared to computed tomography (CT). MR imaging better identifies lesion components and perisellar anatomy, aiding in more specific diagnoses.

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Neurology
    • Oncology

    Background:

    • The suprasellar region contains complex neurovascular structures and diverse pathologies.
    • Accurate characterization of suprasellar lesions is crucial for diagnosis and treatment planning.
    • Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) are key imaging modalities.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To retrospectively evaluate and compare the diagnostic capabilities of MR imaging and CT for suprasellar lesions.
    • To assess the effectiveness of MR imaging in characterizing specific lesion components.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective analysis of 59 suprasellar lesions using MR imaging.
    • Comparison with CT scans in 55 cases.
    • Evaluation of lesion characteristics including hemorrhage, fat, flowing blood, mucus, and cyst.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • MR imaging enabled more specific diagnoses than CT in 6% of cases.
    • MR imaging was equivalent to CT in lesion detection.
    • MR imaging more accurately defined altered perisellar anatomy in 20% of cases.
    • MR imaging demonstrated superior evaluation of vascular abnormalities, potentially avoiding angiography.

    Conclusions:

    • MR imaging provides detailed characterization of suprasellar lesions, including internal components and surrounding anatomy.
    • MR imaging offers advantages over CT in evaluating vascular abnormalities in the suprasellar region.
    • MR imaging is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and management of suprasellar pathologies.