Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Advanced Imaging of Lung Homing Human Lymphocytes in an Experimental In Vivo Model of Allergic Inflammation Based on Light-sheet Microscopy
Published on: April 16, 2019
The Role of Inflammatory Phenotype in Patients With Exacerbation-prone Asthma and Ongoing Therapy
María Florencia Pilia1, María Jesús Cruz2, Donghai Ma3
1Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Universitari Vall d́Hebron, Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain.
Introduction:
The risk factors for having frequent exacerbations are not well documented in cohort studies of patients with asthma on existing therapy. The objective of the present study was to compare the clinical and inflammatory characteristics of patients with exacerbation-prone asthma (EPA) with a history of two or more exacerbations in the previous year with those who had presented just one or no exacerbation.
Methods:
An ambispective observational study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. Patients diagnosed with moderate or severe asthma and ongoing therapy, whose inflammatory profile was determined by means of allergy and atopy status, blood eosinophilia and induced sputum were included. Patients were classified according to the number of asthma exacerbations in EPA (≥2 exacerbations in the previous year) vs. non-exacerbators (≤1 exacerbation in the previous year). Clinical, lung function and inflammatory characteristics of the two groups were compared.
Results:
Three hundred ten patients were visited in the Asthma Unit in 2018 and the combination of atopy and allergy status, blood eosinophilia and induced sputum was obtained in 96 (31%) patients. Of this latter group, 46 patients (47%) presented EPA compared to 50 (53%) non-exacerbators. Airway and blood eosinophilic inflammation did not differ between EPA and non-exacerbators in patients with asthma and ongoing therapy, and it was not a risk factor for EPA in our cohort.
Conclusion:
Airway or blood type 2 inflammation status is not a valid tool for recognizing EPA or predicting asthma exacerbations in asthma patients following controller therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Asthma-II: Pathophysiology and Classification
Additionally, environmental and genetic factors play crucial roles in determining an individual's susceptibility to asthma and the severity of their condition.
Critical processes in asthma pathophysiology include:
Asthma: Pathogenesis and Management
Asthma is classified as allergic and non-allergic. Allergens such as dust mites, pollen, and pet dander trigger allergic asthma, while factors like cold air, intense emotions, or exercise can induce non-allergic asthma.
Asthma-III: Symptoms and Complications
Classification of Asthma
Asthma-I: Introduction
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-II: Pathophysiology
Chronic Inflammation
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...

