Prospective direct comparison of non-invasive liver tests in outpatients with type 2 diabetes using...

No prospective diagnostic studies have directly compared widespread non-invasive liver tests in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using the intention-to-diagnose method for each of the three main histological features of metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease - namely fibrosis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), and steatosis.

To compare the performance of nine tests using the intention-to-diagnose rather than the standard method, which would exclude non-evaluable participants METHODS: Biopsy was used as the reference with predetermined cut-offs, advanced fibrosis being the main endpoint. The Nash-FibroTest panel including FibroTest-T2D, SteatoTest-T2D and MashTest-T2D was optimised for type 2 diabetes. FibroTest-T2D was compared to vibration-controlled transient elastography stiffness (VCTE), two-dimensional shear-wave elastography stiffness (TD-SWE), and Fibrosis-4 blood test. NashTest-T2D was compared to aspartate aminotransferase. SteatoTest-T2D was compared to the controlled attenuation parameter and the hepatorenal gradient.

Among 402 cases, non-evaluable tests were 6.7% for VCTE, 4.0% for hepatorenal gradient, 3.2% for controlled attenuation parameter, 1.5% for TD-SWE, 1.2% for NashTest-T2D, and 0.02% for Fibrosis-4, aspartate aminotransferase and SteatoTest-T2D. The VCTE AUROC for advanced fibrosis was over-estimated by 6% (0.83 [95% CI: 0.78-0.87]) by standard analysis compared to intention-to-diagnose (0.77 [0.72-0.81] p = 0.008). The AUROCs for advanced fibrosis did not differ significantly in intention-to-diagnose between FibroTest-T2D (0.77; 95% CI: 0.73-0.82), VCTE (0.77; 95% CI: 0.72-0.81) and TD-SWE(0.78; 0.74-0.83) but were all higher than the Fibrosis-4 score (0.70; 95% CI all differences ≥7%; p ≤ 0.03). For MASH, MashTest-T2D had a higher AUROC (0.76; 95% CI: 0.70-0.80) than aspartate aminotransferase (0.72; 95% CI: 0.66-0.77; p = 0.035). For steatosis, AUROCs did not differ significantly between SteatoTest-T2D, controlled attenuation parameter and hepatorenal gradient.

In intention-to-diagnose analysis, FibroTest-T2D, TD-SWE and VCTE performed similarly for staging fibrosis, and out-performed Fibrosis-4 in outpatients with type 2 diabetes. The standard analysis over-estimated VCTE performance.

gov: NCT03634098.