Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: Examining Volatile Sex Pheromone Influence on Male C. elegans Behavior
Published on: August 9, 2024
"Three Decades of Research:" A New Sex Ed Agenda and the Veneer of Science
Irene H Ericksen1, Stan E Weed2
1Irene H. Ericksen, M.S., is a Senior Research Associate at The Institute for Research & Evaluation, a nonprofit research agency that has been evaluating sex education in schools for more than 30 years, involving more than 100 evaluation studies and 900,000 teens, including studies in 30 U.S. states (many federally funded) and three international countries. She has spent 15 years in the field of sex education research; was one of six national consultants to a landmark CDC sponsored meta-analysis on sex education effectiveness (2012); has been an invited presenter at the National Academies of Sciences (2019), United Nations Civil Society Conference (2019), and U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2020); and is an Honorary Fellow of the American College of Pediatricians (2020).
Abstract:
The research review, "Three Decades of Research: The Case for Comprehensive Sex Education," by Goldfarb and Lieberman (2021), purports to show "strong support" for the effectiveness of school-based comprehensive sex education (CSE) at producing many benefits beyond its original goals of preventing teen pregnancy and STDs. We reviewed the evidence the study cites in support of these claims, item by item, and found that 1) 80% of the sources cited as supporting evidence for CSE are not studies of CSE programs and 2) of the few cited studies of actual CSE programs, roughly 90% do not meet recommended scientific standards for evidence of program effectiveness. Important to note, contrary to its claims, the study does not show scientific evidence that comprehensive sex education helps prevent child sex abuse, reduces dating/intimate partner violence or homophobic bullying, or that it should be taught to young children in the early grades. Rather than making "the case for CSE," Goldfarb and Lieberman's review gives the appearance of scientific support to a new CSE agenda that the authors articulate and endorse, which includes early sex education, gender ideology, and social justice theory. However, they do not present scientifically reliable confirmatory evidence for that agenda.
More Related Videos
09:55Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Ethics in Research
Psychology as a Science
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
The Scientific Method
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Sexually Transmitted Infections