Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
The Y Chromosome Determines Maleness02:19

The Y Chromosome Determines Maleness

6.7K
The Y chromosome is a sex chromosome found in several vertebrates and mammals, including humans. In addition to 22 pairs of autosomes, the human males have one X chromosome and one Y chromosome. In these organisms, the presence or absence of the Y chromosome determines the development of male traits.
Evolution
Around 300 million years ago, the two sex chromosomes diverged from two identical autosomal chromosomes. Over time, the Y chromosome has lost most of its genes, shrinking in size....
6.7K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.1K
Sex-linked Disorders01:43

Sex-linked Disorders

102.3K
Like autosomes, sex chromosomes contain a variety of genes necessary for normal body function. When a mutation in one of these genes results in biological deficits, the disorder is considered sex-linked.
102.3K
Mate Choice01:20

Mate Choice

8.1K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
8.1K
X and Y Chromosomes02:32

X and Y Chromosomes

26.3K
Among mammals, the gender of an organism is determined by the sex chromosomes. Humans have two sex chromosomes, X and Y. Every human diploid cell has 22 pairs of autosomes and one pair of sex chromosomes. A human female has two X chromosomes, while a male has one X chromosome and one Y chromosome.
The germline cells such as egg and sperm cells carry only half the number of chromosomes, i.e., 22 autosomes and one sex chromosome. All eggs have an X chromosome, while sperm cells can carry an X or...
26.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Introduction to Special Issue: Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on LGBTQ+ Health and Well-Being.

Journal of homosexuality·2021
Same author

Healthcare Providers' Pregnancy Prevention Counseling of Trans and Non-Binary Assigned Female at Birth (TNB/AFAB) Patients.

Journal of homosexuality·2020
Same author

Differential Influence of Weight Status on Chronic Diseases by Reported Sexual Orientation Identity in Men.

LGBT health·2019
Same author

Sexual and gender minority health research in nursing.

Nursing outlook·2018
Same author

Development of an LGB-specific health literacy scale.

Health communication·2017
Same author

Choosing "Something Else" as a Sexual Identity: Evaluating Response Options on the National Health Interview Survey.

LGBT health·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Skeletal Muscle Gender Dimorphism from Proteomics
09:29

Skeletal Muscle Gender Dimorphism from Proteomics

Published on: December 14, 2011

12.6K

Queer Faculty in the Academy: Is It Getting Better?

Michele J Eliason1

  • 1Department of Public Health, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, USA.

Journal of Homosexuality
|August 29, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study highlights how structural oppression and university meritocracy create barriers for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) faculty. Strategies include community building and cross-group coalitions for greater inclusion.

Keywords:
LGBTQ facultycoming out in the classroomresearch fundingresearch publicationtenure and promotion

More Related Videos

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:27

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

787
Detecting Estrogenic Ligands in Personal Care Products using a Yeast Estrogen Screen Optimized for the Undergraduate Teaching Laboratory
14:13

Detecting Estrogenic Ligands in Personal Care Products using a Yeast Estrogen Screen Optimized for the Undergraduate Teaching Laboratory

Published on: January 1, 2018

13.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Skeletal Muscle Gender Dimorphism from Proteomics
09:29

Skeletal Muscle Gender Dimorphism from Proteomics

Published on: December 14, 2011

12.6K
Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:27

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

787
Detecting Estrogenic Ligands in Personal Care Products using a Yeast Estrogen Screen Optimized for the Undergraduate Teaching Laboratory
14:13

Detecting Estrogenic Ligands in Personal Care Products using a Yeast Estrogen Screen Optimized for the Undergraduate Teaching Laboratory

Published on: January 1, 2018

13.2K

Area of Science:

  • Sociology of Higher Education
  • LGBTQ Studies
  • Organizational Psychology

Background:

  • Marginalized faculty, including LGBTQ individuals, women, and faculty of color, face systemic barriers in higher education.
  • University environments often emphasize meritocracy, individual effort, and competition, masking structural oppression.
  • The experiences of LGBTQ faculty are shaped by unique challenges related to visibility and advocacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify common themes and structural barriers hindering the full inclusion of diverse faculty in higher education.
  • To analyze the specific challenges faced by lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) faculty members.
  • To propose strategies for overcoming these barriers and fostering a more inclusive academic environment.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis integrating the author's personal experiences as an out lesbian researcher.
  • Review of contemporary research on LGBTQ faculty experiences.
  • Synthesis of literature on the experiences of other marginalized faculty groups (women, faculty of color).

Main Results:

  • Structural oppression in universities is often invisible, creating unspoken barriers to faculty success.
  • Key themes include the paradox of visibility (being out, conducting LGBTQ research, activism), curricular challenges, and internalized oppression.
  • Commonalities exist between the experiences of LGBTQ faculty and other marginalized groups.

Conclusions:

  • Overcoming barriers requires acknowledging and addressing structural oppression, not just focusing on individual effort.
  • Strategies include LGBTQ-specific organizing, community building, and forming coalitions across diverse faculty groups.
  • Creating inclusive academic environments necessitates systemic change and intentional efforts to support marginalized faculty.