Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025
A New Hybrid Quantitative Evaluation Model for Axillary Junctional Hemorrhage in Swine
Published on: December 6, 2024
Smart Tactical Application Tourniquet Versus Combat Application Tourniquet: Comparing Layperson Applications for
Robert L Gabbitas1, Brandon M Carius2
1Emergency Medicine, Irwin Army Community Hospital, Fort Riley, USA.
Background:
Tourniquet efficacy for extremity hemorrhage is well established, although literature demonstrates variable first responder application efficacy. Several newer models, including the Smart Tactical Application Tourniquet (STAT, STAT Medical Devices, LLC, Freehold, New Jersey), offer alternatives to well-established devices like the Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT, C-A-T Resources, LLC, Rock Hill, South Carolina). Newer models are commercially sold without significant literature regarding efficacy or user feedback. We developed a pilot study to compare CAT and STAT applications for layperson hemorrhage control efficacy after a brief, standardized instructional video.
Study Design And Methods:
This is a prospective randomized observational study that utilized layperson volunteers for the application of STAT or CAT. After a demographic survey, volunteers were randomized and watched the respective tourniquet instructional video, then applied the tourniquet to a HapMed hemorrhage simulator. The application was assessed for trial time, time to hemorrhage control, occlusion pressure, and total blood loss. Investigators also evaluated volunteers for proper application and received user feedback.
Results:
Eighty-four total volunteers (42 CAT, 42 STAT) completed testing. Volunteers applied the CAT (50.0%, n = 21) with significantly greater rates of success than the STAT (0%, n = 0, p < 0.001). The CAT demonstrated significantly greater average occlusion pressure compared to the STAT (409.9 mm Hg vs. 116.5 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Similarly, CAT application resulted in significantly less average blood loss compared to the STAT (577.8 mL vs. 974.6 mL, p < 0.001). On the 5-point Likert scale, volunteers reported significantly higher benefits from video instruction and comfort with tourniquet application with the CAT over the STAT (4.7 vs. 4.0, p < 0.001, 4.0 vs. 2.4, p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
When performed by laypersons with minimal video instruction, the CAT was applied with significantly higher rates of success, higher mean occlusion pressures, reduced blood loss, and higher end-user ratings than the STAT.
