Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Group Polarization

Group Polarization

Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.

Groupthink

Groupthink

When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...

Confirmation Biases

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Will we habituate to the decline of democracy?

Science advances·2025

Same author

Driving sustainable change: A systematic map of behaviorally informed interventions to promote sustainable mobility behavior.

PNAS nexus·2025

Same author

Lessons from COVID-19 for behavioural and communication interventions to enhance vaccine uptake.

Communications psychology·2024

Same author

A synthesis of evidence for policy from behavioural science during COVID-19.

Nature·2023

Same author

Human bias in algorithm design.

Nature human behaviour·2023

Same author

The distributional effects of nudges.

Nature human behaviour·2021

Same journal

Shared intentionality and attachment theories in WILD and WEIRD contexts.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Constructing an architecture for a decolonized developmental science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Go WILD, but mind the gap.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

WILDing the study of developmental trajectories in navigation and wayfinding: Progress and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

WILD kids, cutting-edge research. Enhancing diversity and reflexivity in psychology.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same journal

Ethnographic methods can help psychology overcome its WEIRD problems.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Conspiracy theory.

Cass R Sunstein¹

¹Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA csunstei@law.harvard.edu.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences

|August 30, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Behavioral science in policymaking primarily reforms systems, not individuals. Evidence does not support claims that individual-focused interventions hinder systemic reform efforts.

More Related Videos

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Deciphering Molecular Mechanism of Histone Assembly by DNA Curtain Technique

Deciphering Molecular Mechanism of Histone Assembly by DNA Curtain Technique

Published on: March 9, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Deciphering Molecular Mechanism of Histone Assembly by DNA Curtain Technique

Deciphering Molecular Mechanism of Histone Assembly by DNA Curtain Technique

Published on: March 9, 2022

Area of Science:

Social Science
Behavioral Economics
Public Policy

Background:

A critique by Chater & Loewenstein suggests behavioral science is misused in policymaking.
The critique posits that interventions focus on individual behavior change and hinder systemic reform.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the validity of the critique regarding the application of behavioral science in policymaking.
To examine the empirical support for claims that individual-focused interventions impede systemic reform.

Main Methods:

Analysis of current practices in behavioral science application within policy contexts.
Review of empirical literature on the impact of behavioral interventions on systemic change.

Main Results:

Behavioral science is predominantly utilized for systemic reforms in policymaking.
Empirical evidence does not substantiate the claim that individual-focused interventions reduce the likelihood of systemic reform.

Conclusions:

The critique by Chater & Loewenstein regarding the application of behavioral science in policy is unfounded.
Current use of behavioral science in policy focuses on systemic improvements, not solely individual behavior modification.