Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.3K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.3K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.8K
Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation01:18

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

477
Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between...
477
Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation01:27

Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation

433
Clark Hull's drive-reduction theory, introduced in the 1940s and 1950s and often termed the "push theory" of motivation, provides a framework for understanding how biological and learned drives influence behavior. Hull suggested that motivation originates from the need to alleviate physiological tension caused by unmet biological necessities. The theory proposes that when a basic need, such as hunger or sleep, goes unfulfilled, it creates an internal imbalance. This imbalance, or...
433
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

111
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
111

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Core knowledge shapes what actions are considered and how others will perceive them.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Cultural evolution by revealed preferences - from status signals to alien porn.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Will cultural evolution regain its sight?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Subjective selection needs context: Culture shapes goal selection, evaluations of usefulness, and "actual" effectiveness.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

If lullabies and hero stories are super-attractors, what are music and language? Absolute universals imply genetic mechanisms.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Subjective selection needs socially transmitted goals and culturally evolving problems.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K

Nudging is being framed.

Richard H Thaler1

  • 1Chicago Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA thaler@chicagobooth.edu; https://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/richard-thaler.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|August 30, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Behavioral public policy frameworks like the i-frame and s-frame are limited. Political and systemic factors, such as laws and retirement savings systems, are crucial for effective policy implementation and outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Public Policy Analysis
  • Political Science

Background:

  • Current frameworks for behavioral public policy, specifically the i-frame and s-frame, are critically examined.
  • The influence of political context and regulatory structures on policy effectiveness is often overlooked in existing literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critique the utility of the i-frame and s-frame in behavioral public policy.
  • To highlight the indispensable role of political processes and legal frameworks in policy development.
  • To demonstrate how systemic research, exemplified by retirement savings, challenges current behavioral policy claims.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of existing policy frameworks (i-frame, s-frame).
  • Literature review focusing on the intersection of politics, policy, and behavioral science.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K
  • Case study analysis of retirement savings research to evaluate systemic impacts.

    • Main Results:

    • The i-frame and s-frame are deemed insufficient for comprehensive behavioral public policy analysis.
    • Political considerations and the necessity of laws/regulations are identified as critical, yet neglected, components.
    • Evidence from retirement savings systems contradicts claims that rely solely on individual behavioral framing.

    Conclusions:

    • Behavioral public policy requires a broader perspective that integrates political realities and systemic structures.
    • Effective policy design must account for the legislative and regulatory environment.
    • Future research should emphasize the interplay between individual behavior, political systems, and policy outcomes.