CT acquisition parameter selection in the real world: impacts on radiation dose and variation amongst 155...

Quantify the relationship between CT acquisition parameters and radiation dose, how often parameters are adjusted in real-world practice, and their degree of contribution to real-world dose distribution. Identify discrepancies between parameters that are impactful in theory and impactful in practice.

This study analyses 1.3 million consecutive adult routine abdomen exams performed between November 2015 and Jan 2021 included in the University of California, San Francisco International CT Dose Registry of 155 institutions. We calculated geometric standard deviation (gSD) for five parameters (kV, mAs, spiral pitch, number of phases, scan length) to assess variation in practice. A Gaussian mixed regression model was performed to predict the radiation dose-length product (DLP) using the parameters. Three conceptualizations of "impact" were computed for each parameter. To reflect the theoretical impact, we predict the increase in DLP per 10% (and 15%) increase in the parameter. To reflect the real-world practical impact, we predict the increase in DLP per gSD increase in the parameter.

Among studied examinations, mAs, number of phases, and scan length were frequently manipulated (gSD 1.52-1.70); kV was rarely manipulated (gSD 1.07). Theoretically, kV is the most impactful parameter (29% increase in DLP per 10% increase in kV, versus 5-9% increase for other parameters). In real-world practice, kV is less impactful; for each gSD increase in kV, the DLP increases by 20%, versus 22-69% for other parameters.

Despite the potential impact of kV on radiation dose, this parameter is rarely manipulated in common practice and this potential remains untapped.

CT beam energy (kV) modulation has the potential to strongly reduce radiation over-dosage to the patient, theoretically more so than similar degrees of modulation in other CT acquisition parameters. Despite this, beam energy modulation rarely occurs in practice, leaving its potential untapped.

• The relationship between CT acquisition parameter selection and radiation dose roughly coincided with established theoretical understanding. • CT acquisition parameters differ from each other in frequency and magnitude of manipulation, with beam energy (kV) being rarely manipulated. • Beam energy (kV) has the potential to substantially impact radiation dose, but because it is rarely manipulated, it is the least impactful CT acquisition parameter affecting radiation dose in practice.