Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

Crossover Experiments

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.

Factorial Design

Factorial Design

Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...

Experimental Designs

Experimental Designs

An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Small Femoral Nails and the Development of a Nonunion: A Case-Control Study.

Orthopedics·2026

Same author

Reimagining Orthopaedic Research: The Musculoskeletal Adaptive Platform Trial (MAPT) Design Rationale.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026

Same author

Do computerized tomography images influence surgeons' estimates of posterior tilt angle or treatment preference for minimally displaced femoral neck fractures?

Journal of orthopaedic trauma·2026

Same author

Randomised controlled trial comparing antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy for the management of severe open tibia fracture wounds: Beads versus VAC (BvV) protocol.

BMJ open·2026

Same author

Do antibiotic bead pouches prevent infections and other complications in patients with Gustilo-Anderson Type III open lower extremity fractures?

Injury·2026

Same author

Can a Targeted Dissemination Strategy of the PREPARE Trial Results Change Surgical Antiseptic Practice?

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026

Same journal

Surgical Fixation Versus Cast Immobilization for Adults With Bicortical Scaphoid Fractures: A Target Trial Emulation of the SWIFFT Trial.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026

Same journal

Dementia as a Marker of Poor Outcome After Hip Hemiarthroplasty.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026

Same journal

Fix or Replace: Evidence for Treatment Options in the Management of Femoral Neck Fractures.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026

Same journal

Epidemiology, Treatment Patterns, and Comorbidities of Trigger Finger: A Contemporary Population-Based Analysis.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026

Same journal

Posterior Approaches to Pilon Fractures: Considerations, Indications, and Outcomes.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026

Same journal

Effect of Season on Patient-reported Outcomes and Discharge Disposition in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Quantify Patient Preferences.

Nathan N O'Hara¹, Marcus F Sciadini

¹From the Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

|August 30, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Discrete choice experiments quantify patient preferences in orthopaedics by analyzing hypothetical choices. This method helps align treatment decisions with patient values and guides preference-responsive research.

More Related Videos

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

Area of Science:

Orthopaedic surgery
Health economics
Decision science

Background:

Quantifying patient preferences is crucial for patient-centered care in orthopaedics.
Traditional methods may not fully capture patient values regarding treatment attributes and trade-offs.

Purpose of the Study:

To summarize the application of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) in orthopaedics.
To provide best practices for designing and reporting DCE studies in this field.
To identify future opportunities for DCEs in orthopaedic research.

Main Methods:

Discrete choice experiments involve presenting respondents with hypothetical treatment options varying in attributes (e.g., risks, benefits, costs).
Respondents make choices between these options, generating data on attribute importance and trade-offs.
Analysis of aggregated choices infers relative attribute importance and acceptable trade-offs.

Main Results:

DCEs provide a robust method for quantifying patient preferences for orthopaedic treatments.
The data can inform surgeons about patient values, aiding in shared decision-making.
This approach supports the design of research that better reflects patient priorities.

Conclusions:

Discrete choice experiments are valuable tools for understanding patient preferences in orthopaedics.
Adherence to best practices in design and reporting enhances the utility of DCE findings.
Further application of DCEs can lead to more patient-aligned orthopaedic care and research.