Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

1.4K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
1.4K
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

3.4K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.4K
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

597
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
597

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility and Acceptability of the Living My Life Program for Rural and Remote Stroke Survivors.

The Australian journal of rural health·2026
Same author

Disability and frailty in people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus in regional Australia: A cross-sectional study with a measurement property assessment of the HIV Disability Questionnaire.

HIV medicine·2026
Same author

Stroke survivors' preferences for recovery-promoting drugs: development and piloting of a discrete choice experiment.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2026
Same author

Does the Living My Life Program stay true to the stroke survivors' lens on recovering?

Australian occupational therapy journal·2025
Same author

Systematic review of co-occurring transition of retirement and migration: An occupational perspective.

The British journal of occupational therapy·2025
Same author

Isolated clubfoot in the Northern Territory of Australia: birth prevalence and population description.

International journal of epidemiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.6K

Evaluating Allied Health Clinical Placement Performance: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Study.

Lisa Simmons1, Ruth Barker1, Fiona Barnett1

  • 1James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

JMIR Research Protocols
|August 31, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study is developing a consensus-based framework to evaluate clinical placement performance in student-led health services. The modified Delphi method will identify key areas for measuring student learning, experience, and costs.

Keywords:
clinical placementcost of placementlearning outcomesstudent experiencestudent-led health care services

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
05:04

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

984

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.6K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
05:04

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

984

Area of Science:

  • Health Professions Education
  • Allied Health
  • Clinical Placements

Background:

  • University-affiliated student-led health services address clinical placement challenges.
  • Existing frameworks for evaluating clinical placement performance lack generalizability and stakeholder input.
  • There's a need for a comprehensive evaluation framework considering student learning, experience, and costs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To gather information on measurement areas for student learning outcomes, placement experience, and costs.
  • To develop consensus on essential components for an evaluation framework in student-led health services.
  • To outline a modified Delphi study protocol for evaluating allied health clinical placements.

Main Methods:

  • A modified Delphi study involving up to 30 experts with diverse clinical placement experience.
  • Purposive sampling to ensure maximum variation in the expert panel.
  • Three rounds of data collection (quantitative and qualitative) to achieve ≥70% consensus on measurement areas.

Main Results:

  • Data analysis is currently in progress.
  • Findings will be published in 2024.
  • The study aims to establish consensus on critical areas for evaluating clinical placement performance.

Conclusions:

  • The modified Delphi approach is suitable for developing an evaluation framework for allied health clinical placements.
  • Multiround expert engagement facilitates consensus on key performance indicators.
  • This methodology will inform a robust framework for assessing clinical placement effectiveness.