Comparison of Functional and Morphological Estimates of Vascular Age

Martin Sigl1,2, Laura Winter1,2, Gerhard Schumacher3

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

In Vivo (Athens, Greece)
|August 31, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Vascular age (VA) estimation methods, carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and pulse wave analysis (PWA), yield non-comparable and often contradictory results. Standardization is crucial for reliable cardiovascular risk assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Preventive Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Vascular age (VA) is an emerging metric in preventive cardiovascular (CV) medicine.
  • VA can be estimated using morphological (e.g., carotid intima-media thickness, CIMT) or functional (e.g., pulse wave analysis, PWA) parameters.
  • PWA is a technique celebrating its 100th anniversary.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the comparability of vascular age (VA) derived from morphological (CIMT) and functional (PWA) parameters.
  • To assess the consistency of VA estimation methods in a cohort of volunteers.

Main Methods:

  • 100 volunteers underwent bilateral CIMT assessment via high-resolution ultrasound.
  • Oscillometric PWA was performed at the brachial forearm site.
  • Vascular ages were calculated using established equations for both CIMT and PWA.

Main Results:

  • Median PWA-derived VA was 55.3 years, while CIMT-derived VA varied significantly (median 43.7 to 64.0 years).
  • 46% of participants showed divergent VAs between the two methods.
  • Both VA measures correlated strongly with chronological age and CV risk factors.

Conclusions:

  • Current methods for estimating vascular age (VA) are not directly comparable.
  • Divergent and contradictory results are frequently observed between CIMT- and PWA-derived VAs.
  • Critical assessment and standardization of VA estimation methods are necessary for clinical validity.
Abstract