Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Utility of Precision Oncology Using Cancer Genomic Profiling for Head and Neck Malignancies
Mioko Matsuo1, Kazuki Hashimoto2, Ryunosuke Kogo2
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan matsuo.mioko.202@m.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
Background/Aim:
In recent years, individual patient cancer genomic profiling (CGP) has become more accessible, allowing determination of therapeutic strategies using driver gene mutations in cancer therapy. However, this precision oncology approach, tailored to specific patients, remains experimental. In this study, we verified the feasibility and benefit of using CGP to guide treatment of malignant head and neck tumors. We aimed to evaluate the profiling and clinical courses of patients with head and neck malignancies who underwent CGP and determine the extent to which CGP for head and neck malignancies has resulted in beneficial drug administration.
Patients And Methods:
We analyzed CGP results, prognosis, and drug administration status in 27 patients. These patients had completed (or were expected to complete) standard therapy or had rare cancers without standard therapy.
Results:
At least one somatic actionable gene alteration was seen in 25 (92.6%) patients, with a median number of actionable alterations per patient of 4 (range=0-11). Drugs in clinical trials were recommended to 22 (81.5%) patients, but none could participate. However, 3 patients (11.1%) could use approved drugs off-label based on CGP results. The most common genetic abnormality was TP53 (66.7%), with TP53 mutations leading to poor prognosis.
Conclusion:
CGP is clinically useful and serves as a bridge to increase the number of therapeutic options. However, candidate drugs confirmed using CGP may be ineffective when administered. Therefore, oncologists should not blindly accept CGP therapeutic recommendations but should make recommendations that lead to optimal therapies after proper verification.
Insights
Cancer genomic profiling (CGP) identified actionable mutations in most head and neck cancer patients. While CGP offers therapeutic options, oncologists must verify recommendations for optimal patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Precision Medicine
Background:
- Individual patient cancer genomic profiling (CGP) is increasingly available for guiding cancer therapy.
- Precision oncology, using CGP to tailor treatments, is an emerging but experimental approach.
- The clinical utility of CGP in head and neck malignancies requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility and benefits of using CGP to guide treatment for malignant head and neck tumors.
- To evaluate the genomic profiling and clinical outcomes of patients with head and neck malignancies who underwent CGP.
- To determine the extent to which CGP has led to beneficial drug administration in head and neck cancers.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of CGP results, prognosis, and drug administration in 27 patients with head and neck malignancies.
- Inclusion of patients who completed standard therapy, were expected to complete it, or had rare cancers lacking standard treatment options.
Main Results:
- Actionable gene alterations were identified in 92.6% of patients, with a median of 4 alterations per patient.
- While 81.5% of patients were recommended drugs in clinical trials, none could participate.
- 11.1% of patients received approved drugs off-label based on CGP findings.
- TP53 mutations were the most common abnormality (66.7%) and associated with poor prognosis.
Conclusions:
- CGP is clinically valuable for expanding therapeutic options in head and neck cancers.
- Recommended drugs based on CGP may not always be effective.
- Oncologists must critically verify CGP recommendations to ensure optimal patient therapy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...

