[A clinical cohort study of split and whole liver transplantations]

Objective: To investigate the surgical efficacy of split liver transplantation. Methods: Patients who underwent liver transplantation at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2015 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into split liver transplantation group (n=60) and whole liver transplantation group (n=765)according to graft types.In the split liver transplantation group, there were 23 males and 37 females, aged (52.5±10.2) years, and the body mass index was (22.4±3.3) kg/m². In the whole liver transplantation group, there were 630 males and 135 females, aged (51.2±9.6) years, and body mass index was (24.5±3.7) kg/m².The basic data of the two groups were matched 1∶1 using the propensity score matching method. The independent sample t test and χ² test were used to compare the intraoperative and postoperative recovery of the two groups of donors and recipients. The overall survival rate and the graft survival rate of the two groups were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and the cumulative survival rate was compared by the Log-rank test. Results: Fifty-one well-matched pairs of data with similar baseline characteristics were obtained. The ratio of graft mass to recipient body weight in the matched split liver transplantation group was (1.78±0.55)%. Operation time(M(IQR))(10.8(1.5)hours vs. 8.0(1.9)hours,U=6.608,P<0.01) and cold ischaemia time(5.4(1.3)hours vs. 4.6(2.2)hours,U=2.825,P=0.005) were significantly longer in the split liver transplantation group than those in the whole liver transplantation group. Intra-operative anhepatic phase(53.0(15.0)minutes vs. 57.0(24.0)minutes,U=1.048,P=0.295),bleeding volume(1 000(1 400)ml vs. 1 200(1 200)ml,U=0.966,P=0.334) and intraoperative instillation of red blood cells(9.0(6.5)U vs. 11.0(11.0)U,U=1.732,P=0.083) were not significantly different between the two groups. However,the split liver transplantation group showed significantly longer postoperative intensive care unit stay(5.0(3.0)days vs. 4.0(4.0)days,U=2.677,P=0.007) and postoperative hospital stay(30.0(15.0)days vs. 26.0(15.0)days,U=2.237,P=0.025) and significantly higher incidence of postoperative complications(56.8%(29/51) vs. 36.6%(19/51),χ²=3.935,P=0.047) than the whole liver transplantation group. Furthermore,levels of alanine transaminase and aspartate aminotransferase were significantly higher on postoperative days 1,4 and 7 in the split liver transplantation group(all P<0.05) than in the whole liver transplantation group;however,there were no significant differences in these levels on postoperative days 14 and 28. The time to restoration of normal liver function in both groups(12.5(13.7)days vs. 9.0(12.5)days,U=1.607,P=0.108) was not statistically significant. Furthermore,the median follow-up time after surgery was 25.6 months in both groups. In postoperative years 1,2,3 and 5, the graft survival rates were 88.1%,80.8%,77.8% and 66.7% in the whole liver transplantation group and 80.3%,70.3%,67.3% and 60.5% in the split liver transplantation group(P=0.171),respectively. The patient survival rates in post-operative years 1,2,3 and 5 were 88.1%,80.8%,77.8% and 66.7% in the whole liver transplantation group and 80.3%,75.9%,70.3% and 63.3% in the split liver transplantation group,respectively(P=0.252). However,the differences of graft survival rates and patient survival rates between the two groups were not significant. Conclusion: Although it affects the early recovery of patients after liver transplantation,split liver transplantation has no effect on long-term survival rates and demonstrates surgical efficacy similar to that of whole liver transplantation.