Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Intravital Microscopy of Tumor-associated Vasculature Using Advanced Dorsal Skinfold Window Chambers on Transgenic Fluorescent Mice
Published on: January 19, 2018
Antitumor effect of anti-vascular therapy with STING agonist depends on the tumor microenvironment context
Justyna Czapla1, Alina Drzyzga1, Sybilla Matuszczak1
1Center for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Introduction:
Targeting tumor vasculature is an efficient weapon to fight against cancer; however, activation of alternative pathways to rebuild the disrupted vasculature leads to rapid tumor regrowth. Immunotherapy that exploits host immune cells to elicit and sustain potent antitumor response has emerged as one of the most promising tools for cancer treatment, yet many treatments fail due to developed resistance mechanisms. Therefore, our aim was to examine whether combination of immunotherapy and anti-vascular treatment will succeed in poorly immunogenic, difficult-to-treat melanoma and triple-negative breast tumor models.
Methods:
Our study was performed on B16-F10 melanoma and 4T1 breast tumor murine models. Mice were treated with the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway agonist (cGAMP) and vascular disrupting agent combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P). Tumor growth was monitored. The tumor microenvironment (TME) was comprehensively investigated using multiplex immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. We also examined if such designed therapy sensitizes investigated tumor models to an immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-1).
Results:
The use of STING agonist cGAMP as monotherapy was insufficient to effectively inhibit tumor growth due to low levels of STING protein in 4T1 tumors. However, when additionally combined with an anti-vascular agent, a significant therapeutic effect was obtained. In this model, the obtained effect was related to the TME polarization and the stimulation of the innate immune response, especially activation of NK cells. Combination therapy was unable to activate CD8+ T cells. Due to the lack of PD-1 upregulation, no improved therapeutic effect was observed when additionally combined with the anti-PD-1 inhibitor. In B16-F10 tumors, highly abundant in STING protein, cGAMP as monotherapy was sufficient to induce potent antitumor response. In this model, the therapeutic effect was due to the infiltration of the TME with activated NK cells. cGAMP also caused the infiltration of CD8+PD-1+ T cells into the TME; hence, additional benefits of using the PD-1 inhibitor were observed.
Conclusion:
The study provides preclinical evidence for a great influence of the TME on the outcome of applied therapy, including immune cell contribution and ICI responsiveness. We pointed the need of careful TME screening prior to antitumor treatments to achieve satisfactory results.
Insights
Combining immunotherapy with anti-vascular treatment shows promise for difficult cancers. Careful tumor microenvironment screening is crucial for effective cancer therapy and predicting immunotherapy response.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Cancer Biology
Background:
- Targeting tumor vasculature is a cancer treatment strategy, but tumor regrowth occurs via alternative pathways.
- Immunotherapy shows promise but faces resistance mechanisms.
- Combination therapy aims to overcome these limitations in challenging tumor models.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the efficacy of combining immunotherapy (STING agonist cGAMP) with anti-vascular treatment (CA4P) in melanoma and triple-negative breast tumor models.
- To assess if this combination therapy sensitizes tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1).
Main Methods:
- Utilized B16-F10 melanoma and 4T1 breast tumor murine models.
- Administered STING agonist cGAMP and vascular disrupting agent CA4P.
- Analyzed tumor growth, tumor microenvironment (TME) using multiplex immunofluorescence and flow cytometry.
- Evaluated response to anti-PD-1 therapy.
Main Results:
- Combination therapy significantly inhibited tumor growth in 4T1 models, linked to TME polarization and NK cell activation, but not CD8+ T cells.
- Monotherapy with cGAMP was insufficient in 4T1 tumors due to low STING protein.
- In B16-F10 tumors, cGAMP monotherapy induced potent antitumor response via NK cell infiltration and CD8+ T cell activation, benefiting from anti-PD-1 combination.
- No improved therapeutic effect with anti-PD-1 in 4T1 models due to lack of PD-1 upregulation.
Conclusions:
- The tumor microenvironment significantly influences therapeutic outcomes and immune checkpoint inhibitor responsiveness.
- Preclinical data highlight the need for TME assessment before initiating antitumor treatments for optimal results.
More Related Videos
09:42Assessing Tumor Microenvironment of Metastasis Doorway-Mediated Vascular Permeability Associated with Cancer Cell Dissemination using Intravital Imaging and Fixed Tissue Analysis
Published on: June 26, 2019
12:09A Novel High-resolution In vivo Imaging Technique to Study the Dynamic Response of Intracranial Structures to Tumor Growth and Therapeutics
Published on: June 16, 2013
Related Concept Videos
The Tumor Microenvironment
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Drugs that Stabilize Microtubules
Drugs that Destabilize Microtubules
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...