Automated ASPECTS calculation may equal the performance of experienced clinicians: a machine learning study based on
1Brain Center, Affiliated Zhejiang Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Objectives:
The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is a semi-quantitative method to evaluate the severity of early ischemic change on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). In this work, we propose an automated ASPECTS method based on large cohort of data and machine learning.
Methods:
For this study, we collected 3626 NCCT cases from multiple centers and annotated directly on this dataset by neurologists. Based on image analysis and machine learning methods, we constructed a two-stage machine learning model. The validity and reliability of this automated ASPECTS method were tested on an independent external validation set of 300 cases. Statistical analyses on the total ASPECTS, dichotomized ASPECTS, and region-level ASPECTS were presented.
Results:
On an independent external validation set of 300 cases, for the total ASPECTS results, the intraclass correlation coefficient between automated ASPECTS and expert-rated was 0.842. The agreement between ASPECTS threshold of ≥ 6 versus < 6 using a dichotomized method was moderate (κ = 0.438, 0.391-0.477), and the detection rate (sensitivity) was 86.5% for patients with ASPECTS threshold of ≥ 6. Compared with the results of previous studies, our method achieved a slight lead in sensitivity (67.8%) and AUC (0.845), with comparable accuracy (78.9%) and specificity (81.2%).
Conclusion:
The proposed automated ASPECTS method driven by a large cohort of NCCT images performed equally well compared with expert-rated ASPECTS. This work further demonstrates the validity and reliability of automated ASPECTS evaluation method.
Clinical Relevance Statement:
The automated ASPECTS method proposed by this study may help AIS patients to receive rapid intervention, but should not be used as a stand-alone diagnostic basis.
Key Points:
NCCT-based manual ASPECTS scores were poorly consistent. Machine learning can automate the ASPECTS scoring process. Machine learning model design based on large cohort data can effectively improve the consistency of ASPECTS scores.
