Survival, Reintervention, and Value of Open and Endovascular Repair for Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia

Daniel J Lehane1, Joshua T Geiger1, Zachary R Zottola1

  • 1Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

Annals of Vascular Surgery
|September 2, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Long-term survival after chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) treatment is not affected by open repair (OR) or endovascular repair (ER). Patient comorbidities, not the procedure, dictate mortality risk, while ER offers superior long-term value.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Gastroenterology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Limited large-scale cohort analyses exist for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) survival and outcomes.
  • Current guidelines suggest open repair (OR) for younger, healthier patients or poor endovascular repair (ER) candidates.
  • This study compares long-term survival, reintervention rates, and value between OR and ER for CMI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate long-term survival differences between open repair (OR) and endovascular repair (ER) for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).
  • To compare reintervention rates and procedural value between OR and ER in CMI patients.
  • To identify factors influencing mortality in CMI patients undergoing surgical intervention.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort analysis of the New York statewide all-payer database (2000-2014).
  • Propensity-matched analysis comparing 1-year and 5-year survival and reintervention rates for OR versus ER.
  • Cox proportional hazards and linear regression models used to assess mortality factors and procedural value.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in 1-year or 5-year survival between OR and ER groups.
  • Congestive heart failure, cancer, and dysrhythmia were associated with 1-year mortality.
  • Cancer, congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease, and age correlated with 5-year mortality.
  • Endovascular repair (ER) showed increased reintervention at 5 years but superior 5-year procedural value.

Conclusions:

  • Long-term mortality after CMI intervention is independent of treatment modality (OR vs. ER).
  • Patient comorbidities, not the surgical approach, are the primary drivers of mortality.
  • Treatment selection for CMI should prioritize anatomic suitability and long-term value, favoring ER when feasible.
Abstract