Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Comparison of Scale in a Photosynthetic Reactor System for Algal Remediation of Wastewater
Published on: March 6, 2017
Constructed wetlands with recycled concrete for wastewater treatment in cold climate: Performance and life cycle
Selina Hube1, Tarek Zaqout1, Ólafur Ögmundarson2
1Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iceland, Hjardarhagi 2-6, IS-107 Reykjavík, Iceland.
Abstract:
This study investigated the technical, environmental, and economic feasibility of using recycled construction material (concrete) as substrate in constructed wetlands for cold climate decentralized domestic wastewater treatment. The wastewater treatment efficiency was examined, and life cycle assessment (LCA) and cost benefit analysis were performed. The technical feasibility was assessed in lab-scale two-stage wetland systems with recycled concrete or lava stone as substrates, which were operated at 22 °C and 5 °C with local wild plants and vegetables. The wetlands removed ∼85 % and ∼51 % of organics and ∼67 % and ∼34 % TN at 22 °C and 5 °C, respectively; no significant difference was found between concrete and lava stone. The heavy metal contents in the cultivated vegetables met WHO standards for human consumption, showing the feasibility of nutrient recovery from the treated wastewater. A comparative LCA of septic tank standalone, septic tank + constructed wetland (with recycled concrete), and gravity-driven ceramic membrane (GDCM) system was performed. This aims to illustrate the benefits of intensifying the existing treatment process (i.e., septic tank) with the constructed wetland, with an alternative membrane-based treatment technique as benchmark. The LCA results revealed that using waste materials as the substrate in constructed wetlands could reduce the environmental impact of wetlands. Installation of the wetland as posttreatment of the septic tank (1) could reduce ∼50 % of eutrophication potential without increasing global warming impact compared to the septic tank alone; (2) had ∼90 % higher global warming impact and ∼40 % lower eutrophication impact compared to GDCM. Economic analysis revealed that the total cost of septic tank + constructed wetland (0.143 €/m3) was comparable to the septic tank alone (merely 3.5 % difference), and 49 % lower than that of GDCM (with recycled membranes). Therefore, the septic tank + constructed wetland scenario could be favorable for sensitive areas with eutrophication potential regarding its technical, economical, and environmental feasibility.
More Related Videos
08:09Wastewater Irrigation Impacts on Soil Hydraulic Conductivity: Coupled Field Sampling and Laboratory Determination of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Published on: August 19, 2018
08:49Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cold Weather Concreting
To counteract the negative impacts of cold weather, ensuring...
Frost Action on Concrete
This freeze-thaw cycle primarily causes surface scaling, where...
Frost Resistant Concrete
Introducing microscopic air bubbles into the concrete mix through air entrainment creates small voids that accommodate ice expansion, thereby reducing internal pressures and preventing cracking. The optimal amount of...
Design Example: Sustainability in Concrete Building
There are multiple approaches to achieve sustainability in a commercial concrete building. For instance, construct a concrete parking area under the building, utilizing pervious concrete paver blocks in open areas to facilitate rainwater collection through an underground...
Design Example: Managing Concrete Workability
Testing Water Quality