Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Longitudinal Child Growth Patterns in Twins and Singletons in the Upstate KIDS Cohort
Jessica L Gleason1, Edwina H Yeung1, Rajeshwari Sundaram2
1Epidemiology Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD.
Insights
Twin growth patterns show catch-up by age 7-9 years, with no increased risk of overweight or obesity. This suggests healthy development, unlike singletons born small-for-gestational age (SGA).
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Endocrinology
- Twin Studies
- Growth and Development
Background:
- Childhood growth patterns are crucial for long-term health.
- Infants born small-for-gestational age (SGA) may face future cardiometabolic risks.
- Understanding twin growth is essential to differentiate normal development from potential health concerns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare childhood growth trajectories in twins versus singletons.
- To determine if twins exhibit excess growth signs similar to SGA singletons.
- To assess cardiometabolic risk factors in twin growth patterns.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the Upstate KIDS cohort (2008-2010) for infant data.
- Compared height, weight, and BMI z-scores at 0-3 and 7-9 years.
- Analyzed rapid weight gain (RWG) and overweight/obesity risk in appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA) twins, AGA singletons, and two SGA twin groups.
Main Results:
- SGA twin groups had lower weight and BMI z-scores than AGA twins at both time points.
- By 7-9 years, SGA twins achieved similar height to AGA twins.
- Twins showed higher RWG in infancy but no increased overweight/obesity risk later.
Conclusions:
- Twins experienced reduced growth z-scores in infancy but normalized by school age.
- No pathological growth or elevated overweight/obesity risk was observed in any twin group.
- Twin growth patterns differ from SGA singletons, indicating healthy catch-up development.
Objectives:
To investigate childhood growth patterns in twins and to determine whether they show the same signs of excess growth as singletons born small-for-gestational age (SGA), which may confer future cardiometabolic risk.
Study Design:
In the Upstate KIDS cohort of infants delivered from 2008 through 2010, we compared height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) z-scores at 0-3 and 7-9 years of age, as well as risk of rapid weight gain (RWG) in infancy and overweight/obesity beginning at 2 years, among appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA) twins (n = 1121), AGA singletons (n = 2684), and two groups of SGA twins: uncertain SGA twins (<10th percentile for birthweight by a singleton reference but >10th% by a population-based twin birthweight reference; n = 319) and true SGA twins (<10th% by a population-based twin reference; n = 144).
Results:
Compared with AGA twins, both SGA twin groups had lower weight and BMI z-scores at both time points. By 7-9 years, both groups caught up in height with AGA twins. Compared with AGA singletons, z-score differences decreased between 0-3 and 7-9 years for uncertain SGA and true SGA twins, though true SGA twins had the lowest z-scores for all measures. During infancy, twins were more likely to display RWG compared with AGA singletons (RR = 2.06 to 2.67), which may reflect normal catch-up growth, as no twin group had higher prevalence of overweight/obesity at either time point.
Conclusions:
Though twins had lower height, weight, and BMI z-scores at birth and into toddlerhood, differences were reduced by 7-9 years, with no evidence of pathological growth and no group of twins showing elevated risk of overweight/obesity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Longitudinal Studies
Cross-Sectional Research
Nature and Nurture
Polygenic Traits
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...

