Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Surgical Management of Meatal Stenosis with Meatoplasty
Published on: November 30, 2010
The association of meatal stenosis and infant circumcision
1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir.
Insights
Circumcision before age one significantly increases the risk of meatal stenosis in boys. This study suggests age one may be a critical cutoff for preventing this condition.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- Meatal stenosis association with circumcision age is debated.
- Early circumcision is traditional in some regions, correlating with high meatal stenosis rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare circumcision age in boys with and without meatal stenosis.
- Investigate the relationship between circumcision timing and meatal stenosis risk.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective case-control study.
- Included 115 boys with meatal stenosis and 205 controls.
- Data collected on age at circumcision and reason for procedure.
Main Results:
- Boys with meatal stenosis had a significantly different median age at circumcision (3 months) compared to controls (5 months).
- Circumcision before age one showed a twofold increase in meatal stenosis risk (39% vs. 23%).
- No significant difference in risk was observed between newborn and later circumcisions.
Conclusions:
- Supports a link between circumcision age and meatal stenosis risk.
- Suggests age one as a potential cutoff for increased meatal stenosis risk.
Background:
The association of meatal stenosis with age at circumcision is controversial. We noticed a high rate of meatal stenosis in a region where early circumcision is traditional. The aim of this study is to compare the age at circumcision between boys with or without meatal stenosis.
Methods:
After ethical approval, families of children with meatal stenosis were questioned about age at circumcision and reason for circumcision. Control group consisted of patients with diagnoses other than penile abnormalities, a normal urethral meatus, and having no symptoms about urination. Patients with a history of therapeutic circumcision were excluded from the study.
Results:
Between November 2016 and November 2020, 115 patients with meatal stenosis were admitted. All were corrected with ventral meatotomy under general anesthesia. Median age at circumcision was 3 (min:0-max:111) monthsand age at admission was 74 (min:22-max:194) months. Control group consisted of 205 boys. Median age at circumcision was 5 (min:0-max:122) months and age at admission was 96 (13-202) months. There was a statistically significant difference between groups in terms of age at circumcision (p=0.024) but none for age at admission (p=0.356). There was a twofold increase in the meatal stenosis rate (39% vs. 23%) if circumcision was performed before age one (p=0.018). There was no difference between the patients circumcised in the newborn period and later (38% vs 36%, p=0.778).
Conclusions:
Our study supports the previous reports suggesting a relation of risk for meatal stenosis and age at circumcision and presents data that age one might be a cutoff for this risk.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction

