Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function in Experimental Models of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Published on: June 27, 2025
Central blood pressure obtained by cuff-based oscillometry as a determinant of left ventricular hypertrophy in
Mohamed Aboel-Kassem F Abdelmegid1, Doaa A Fouad1, Nardeen W M Beshay1
1Cardiovascular Medicine Department, Assiut University Heart Hospital, Assiut University.
Insights
Central systolic blood pressure (SBP) measured non-invasively is a better indicator of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in hypertensive patients than brachial SBP. Increased central SBP and pulse wave velocity (PWV) with aging are more pronounced in patients with LVH.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Conflicting data exist on central blood pressure (CBP) vs. brachial blood pressure (BP) for predicting hypertension-mediated organ damage.
- Most existing data on CBP use applanation tonometry, which has complexities.
- Non-invasive oscillometric CBP measurement offers a simpler alternative for assessing organ damage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) diagnostic factors.
- To evaluate the utility of non-invasive oscillometric CBP measurement and derived hemodynamic indices.
- To compare CBP with brachial BP as indicators of LVH.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study of 300 hypertensive patients (mean age 55.3 years, 51.7% obese).
- Measurements included brachial BP (mercury sphygmomanometer), CBP (Mobil-O-Graph), and left ventricular (LV) mass (echocardiography).
- LVH defined by LV mass index/height 2.7 and relative wall thickness.
Main Results:
- Central systolic BP (SBP) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were significant determinants of LVH.
- Optimally controlled brachial BP was a negative determinant for LVH.
- Central SBP demonstrated acceptable diagnostic performance for LVH (AUC = 0.722).
Conclusions:
- Estimated central SBP using Mobil-O-Graph correlated significantly higher with LVH than brachial SBP.
- Aging-related increases in central SBP and PWV were more pronounced in patients with LVH.
Objective:
Limited and conflicting data have been reported on the prognostic relevance of central blood pressure (CBP) compared with brachial blood pressure (BP) in the anticipation of hypertension-mediated organ damage and the majority of data derived using applanation tonometry with its known complexities. The objective of the present study was to investigate the diagnostic factors of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) with a special highlight on the utility of non-invasive oscillometric CBP measurement and derived hemodynamic indices compared to brachial BP as indicators of LVH.
Methods:
This cross-sectional study included 300 hypertensive patients (mean age 55.3 years, 61.3% female, 51.7% obese) with a mean duration of hypertension was 5.8 years. They underwent measurement of brachial BP, using a mercury sphygmomanometer, and CBP, using a Mobil-O-Graph, alongside the determination of left ventricular (LV) mass by two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. LVH and LV geometric patterns were defined by LV mass index/height 2.7 and relative wall thickness.
Results:
Bivariate then multivariate analysis showed that age, BMI, central systolic BP (SBP), and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were significant determinants of LVH and optimally controlled brachial BP was a significant negative determinant for LVH. Central SBP had an acceptable diagnostic performance to determine LVH in patients with hypertension (AUC = 0.722, 95% confidence interval: 0.618-0.824, SE = 0.21, P -value <0.001). Using one-way ANOVA, a comparison of means among age groups showed that the steady increase in central SBP and PWV with aging was greater among LVH patients than non-LVH patients.
Conclusion:
Estimated central SBP using Mobil-O-Graph showed a significantly higher correlation to LVH than brachial SBP values. The consistent increase in central SBP and PWV with aging was greater among LVH patients than non-LVH patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Sites for measruring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

