Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Production of Extracellular Matrix Fibers via Sacrificial Hollow Fiber Membrane Cell Culture
Published on: February 2, 2019
How to Select an Extracellular Matrix for Wound Repair: A Comprehensive Review
Samuel Stetkevich1, Monik Gupta2, Richard Simman3,4
1Department of Medicine, UCLA-Oliveview Medical Center, Sylmar, California.
This review compares extracellular matrices (ECMs) for wound healing, finding acellularized fish skin (AFS) offers superior healing and cosmetic outcomes, despite accessibility challenges. Bioengineered matrices and xenografts provide good alternatives with antimicrobial properties.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Regenerative Medicine
- Wound Care
Background:
- Extracellular matrix (ECM) products have evolved since 1930 to improve wound healing, minimize scarring, and reduce pain.
- Physician selection of ECMs is currently based on experience and patient-specific factors, lacking comprehensive comparative data.
- A need exists for a thorough investigation comparing the majority of available ECMs for wound healing efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a literature review to identify the optimal extracellular matrix (ECM) for wound healing and positive patient outcomes.
- To compare indications, advantages, and disadvantages of various ECMs to guide clinical selection.
- To provide an evidence-based approach to ECM selection in wound care.
Main Methods:
- A literature review was performed using the PubMed database, analyzing 71 articles.
- Primary search terms included "extracellular matrix," "xenograft," "allograft," "bioengineered matrix," "acellularized fish skin," and "wound healing."
- The review focused on clinical trials, case series, and other review articles, evaluating popular ECMs.
Main Results:
- Allografts are suitable but inferior to bioengineered matrices, porcine/bovine xenografts, and acellularized fish skin (AFS) in healing rate and quality.
- Bioengineered matrices and xenografts offer antimicrobial properties, low immunogenicity, and cost-effectiveness but have limitations in healing time and cosmesis.
- AFS demonstrates superior healing times and cosmetic results, with antimicrobial and low immunogenicity benefits, though accessibility and cost are potential drawbacks.
Conclusions:
- This review provides a guide to ECM selection, reducing subjectivity in clinical decision-making.
- Further head-to-head trials are recommended to develop a more algorithmic approach to wound healing selection.
- Implementing objective measures like the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score in future trials is suggested.
Related Concept Videos
Phases of Wound Repair
Formation of Blood Clot
In case of deep injuries, trauma to blood vessels results in blood loss. In the meantime, phospholipids released from the ruptured endothelial cellular membrane are converted into arachidonic...
The Extracellular Matrix
In order to maintain tissue organization, many animal cells are surrounded by structural molecules that make up the extracellular matrix (ECM). Together, the molecules in the ECM maintain the structural integrity of tissue as well as the remarkable specific properties of certain tissues.
Composition of the Extracellular Matrix
The extracellular matrix (ECM) is commonly composed of ground substance, a gel-like fluid, fibrous components, and many structurally and functionally diverse...
Extracellular Matrix
Role of Matrix Metalloproteases in Degradation of ECM
Overview of Cell-Matrix Interactions
Cell-matrix's Response to Mechanical Forces
Anchoring junctions mechanically attach a cell to the...

