Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography01:27

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

26
DefinitionComputed Tomography (CT) of the genitourinary (GU) tract is a non-invasive imaging modality that utilizes X-rays and computer processing to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the urinary system, encompassing the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and adjacent structures such as the adrenal glands.PurposeCT scans of the GU tract serve several diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including:Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Diseases: Detects kidney stones, tumors, cysts, and congenital...
26
Computed Tomography01:10

Computed Tomography

4.6K
Tomography refers to imaging by sections. Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that uses computers to analyze several cross-sectional X-rays to reveal minute details about structures in the body.
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
4.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diagnostic Performance of a Novel Wireless Direct-Conversion Intraoral Sensor Versus CMOS and PSP Systems for Proximal Caries Detection: An Ex Vivo Study.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2026
Same author

Image distortion in stationary intraoral tomosynthesis from different high-density materials.

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology·2026
Same author

Impact of over-contoured restorations on the marginal bone around tissue-level implants: A retrospective radiographic analysis.

Journal of periodontology·2026
Same author

Impact of imaging protocol and tube current adjustment on the radiation dose in CBCT imaging of mandibular incisors.

Clinical oral investigations·2025
Same author

Comparison of image quality between intraoral radiographic images using wall-mounted and handheld dental X-ray units.

Oral radiology·2025
Same author

Faculty Perspective on Physical Symptoms and Signs Wearing Personal Protective Equipment During COVID-19 Pandemic.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Three-Dimensional Phase Resolved Functional Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10:44

Three-Dimensional Phase Resolved Functional Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: June 21, 2024

542

Filtered back projection vs. iterative reconstruction for CBCT: effects on image noise and processing time.

Amanda Ramage1, Bryan Lopez Gutierrez1, Kathleen Fischer1

  • 1University of Louisville School of Dentistry, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology
|September 4, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Iterative reconstruction (IR) significantly reduces cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image noise compared to filtered back projection (FBP). This noise reduction is achieved without a substantial increase in processing time, improving image quality for dental applications.

Keywords:
Computer-Assisted Image ProcessingDental ImplantsMeSH terms: Cone-Beam Computed TomographyRadiographic Image Enhancement

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

882
Near Infrared Optical Projection Tomography for Assessments of β-cell Mass Distribution in Diabetes Research
15:18

Near Infrared Optical Projection Tomography for Assessments of β-cell Mass Distribution in Diabetes Research

Published on: January 12, 2013

16.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Three-Dimensional Phase Resolved Functional Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10:44

Three-Dimensional Phase Resolved Functional Lung Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: June 21, 2024

542
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

882
Near Infrared Optical Projection Tomography for Assessments of β-cell Mass Distribution in Diabetes Research
15:18

Near Infrared Optical Projection Tomography for Assessments of β-cell Mass Distribution in Diabetes Research

Published on: January 12, 2013

16.4K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Radiology
  • Dental Imaging

Background:

  • Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is crucial in dental diagnostics.
  • Image noise impacts diagnostic accuracy.
  • Filtered back projection (FBP) is a standard reconstruction method, but iterative reconstruction (IR) offers potential improvements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of FBP and IR on CBCT image noise.
  • To assess the effect of acquisition parameters and metal artifact reduction (MAR) on noise.
  • To compare the processing time of FBP and IR.

Main Methods:

  • CBCT scans of a mandible with and without an implant were acquired using varying parameters (mA, FOV, resolution).
  • Images were reconstructed using FBP and IR, with and without MAR.
  • Image noise was quantified using standard deviation of gray density values; processing time was recorded.

Main Results:

  • Iterative reconstruction (IR) significantly reduced image noise compared to filtered back projection (FBP) across all parameters (p < 0.05).
  • Noise reduction ranged from 29.7% to 58.1% depending on acquisition settings.
  • IR increased processing time by an average of 35.1 seconds.

Conclusions:

  • Iterative reconstruction (IR) is superior to filtered back projection (FBP) in reducing CBCT image noise.
  • The benefits of IR in noise reduction outweigh the moderate increase in processing time.
  • IR enhances CBCT image quality for dental applications.