Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Design of Cecal Ligation and Puncture and Intranasal Infection Dual Model of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression
Published on: June 15, 2019
Role of dexmedetomidine in modifying immune paralysis in patients with septic shock: randomized controlled trial
Mohamed Elayashy1, Eman A Elsayed2, Ahmed M Mukhtar2
1Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Kasr Al-Ainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. mohamedelayashy@kasralainy.edu.eg.
Background:
Immune paralysis can be defined as a hypoinflammatory state associated with the incapacity of the immune system to release proinflammatory mediators despite the clearance of pathogens by antimicrobials. Persistent immune paralysis leads to failure to eradicate primary infections with a substantial increase in the risk of multiorgan dysfunction and mortality. The state of immune paralysis is caused mainly by the diminished ability of monocytes to release proinflammatory cytokines in response to endotoxin. This phenomenon is known as endotoxin tolerance. This study aimed to assess the role of dexmedetomidine in modifying immune paralysis in septic shock patients.
Methods:
Twenty-four patients with septic shock were randomized into two groups of 12 patients. A continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine started at 0.15 µg kg-1 hr-1 and adjusted by 0.15 µg kg-1 h-1 to a maximum of 0.75 µg kg-1 h-1 (10 ml h-1), while midazolam was started at 1 mg h-1 (2 mL hr-1) and adjusted by 1 mg h-1 to a maximum of 5 mg h-1 (10 mL h-1). All infusions were adjusted by increments of 2 mL/hr-1 to maintain blinding. Serum levels of CD42a+/CD14+, HLADR+/CD14+, CRP, IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α were measured at baseline (T1), 12 h (T2), and 24 h (T3).
Results:
Treatment with dexmedetomidine yielded no significant difference in CD42a+/CD14+, HLADR+/CD14, CD24b-MFI, HLADR-MFI, IL6 and TREM1 at all time points when compared with midazolam treatment. There was no significant difference in TLR levels between the two groups. Cardiac output in the dexmedetomidine group showed a significant decrease at 6, 12 and 24 h (P = 0.033, 0.021, and 0.005, respectively) compared with that in the midazolam group.
Conclusion:
Our results indicated that dexmedetomidine did not affect CD42a+/CD14+ and HLA-DR+/CD14+ expression in septic patients. Furthermore, cytokine production and inflammatory biomarkers did not change with dexmedetomidine infusion. Trial registration Clinical trial.gov registry (NCT03989609) on June 14, 2019, https://register.
Clinicaltrials:
gov .
Related Concept Videos
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because...
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...

