Comparison of clinically available dynamic susceptibility contrast post processing software to differentiate...

The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare two, widely available software packages for calculation of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC) perfusion MRI normalized relative Cerebral Blood Volume (rCBV) values to differentiate tumor progression from pseudoprogression in treated high-grade glioma patients.

rCBV maps processed by Siemens Syngo.via (Siemens Healthineers) and Olea Sphere (Olea Medical) software packages were co-registered to contrast-enhanced T1 (T1-CE). Regions of interest based on T1-CE were transferred to the rCBV maps. rCBV was calculated using mean values and normalized using contralateral normal- appearing white matter. The Wilcoxon test was performed to assess for significant differences, and software-specific optimal rCBV cutoff values were determined using the Youden index. Interrater reliability was evaluated for two raters using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

41 patients (18 females; median age = 59 years; range 21-77 years) with 49 new or size-increasing post-treatment contrast-enhancing lesions were included (tumor progression = 40 lesions; pseudoprogression = 9 lesions). Optimal rCBV cutoffs of 1.31 (Syngo.via) and 2.40 (Olea) were significantly different, with an AUC of 0.74 and 0.78, respectively. Interrater reliability was 0.85.

We demonstrate that different clinically available MRI DSC-perfusion software packages generate significantly different rCBV cutoff values for the differentiation of tumor progression from pseudoprogression in standard-of-care treated high grade gliomas. Physicians may want to determine the unique value of their perfusion software packages on an institutional level in order to maximize diagnostic accuracy when faced with this clinical challenge. Furthermore, combined with implementation of current DSC-perfusion recommendations, multi-center comparability will be improved.