Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: Overcoming Anti-VEGF Resistance Through Advanced Vascular Morphology Assessment in Choroidal Neovascularization
Published on: August 11, 2023
Treatment discontinuation patterns of anti-VEGF in retinal vein occlusion
Amy Basilious1, Julie Duncan2, Bobbi Smuck2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Ivey Eye Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, ON..
Objective:
The purpose of this research is to report on real-world anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment patterns in retinal vein occlusions (RVO).
Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Participants:
Treatment-naive RVO patients initiating anti-VEGF injections between 2015 and 2021.
Methods:
Medical records available until June 2022 were reviewed. Demographics, diagnosis, number of injections, treatment length, reason for discontinuation, and baseline and final data (e.g., date, age, best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], and central subfield thickness) were recorded. Statistical analyses performed with STATA 17.0 assessed differences between baseline and final values, branch (BRVO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), and treatment-discontinuation subgroups.
Results:
A total of 219 treatment-naive eyes were included (70.3 ± 13.2 years of age, 52.5% female), with 99 BRVOs and 120 CRVOs (2482 injections). The discontinuation rate was 76.7% (168 of 219), with 72.7% of patients (77 of 99) with BRVOs and 75.8% of patients (91 of 120) with CRVOs discontinuing injections. Reasons for discontinuation included stable off active therapy (98 eyes), severe comorbidity or death (17 eyes), switched to intraocular steroid (implant or injection) (12 eyes), lack of visual benefit (10 eyes), ocular comorbidity (5 eyes), patient decision (5 eyes), and patient transfer (5 eyes). Among the remaining 67 eyes, 16 (24%) were lost to follow-up. Reasons for discontinuation differed between BRVO and CRVO patients (p = 0.002). Eyes with CRVO presented with worse BCVA (p < 0.0001) and achieved worse final BCVA (p < 0.0001), but both groups experienced improvements (p < 0.0001). Younger age, better baseline BCVA, and a diagnosis of BRVO were independent predictors of better final visual acuity.
Conclusion:
Over 7.5 years, treatment was discontinued for three-quarters of RVOs. Stable disease was the most common reason for discontinuation, with nearly half (45%) of all RVOs in the cohort stable off active therapy. Better visual outcomes were achieved in BRVO than in CRVO, although both groups benefited from treatment.
Insights
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment for retinal vein occlusions (RVO) was discontinued in most patients, often due to stable disease. Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) patients generally had better outcomes than central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) patients.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Retinal diseases
- Medical treatments
Background:
- Retinal vein occlusions (RVO) are a significant cause of vision loss.
- Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is a common treatment for RVO.
- Understanding real-world treatment patterns is crucial for optimizing patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze real-world anti-VEGF treatment patterns in patients with retinal vein occlusions (RVO).
- To identify reasons for treatment discontinuation and factors influencing outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of treatment-naive RVO patients from 2015-2021.
- Data collected included demographics, diagnosis, injection frequency, treatment duration, and visual acuity.
- Statistical analyses compared outcomes between branch RVO (BRVO) and central RVO (CRVO) and discontinuation subgroups.
Main Results:
- A total of 219 eyes were analyzed, with 2482 anti-VEGF injections administered.
- The discontinuation rate was 76.7%, with stable disease being the most common reason (45% of all RVOs).
- Central RVO (CRVO) eyes had worse baseline and final visual acuity compared to branch RVO (BRVO) eyes, though both groups improved.
Conclusions:
- Anti-VEGF treatment for RVO is frequently discontinued, primarily due to disease stability.
- Branch RVO (BRVO) patients achieved better visual outcomes than central RVO (CRVO) patients.
- Despite discontinuation, anti-VEGF therapy demonstrated benefit for both RVO subtypes.
Related Concept Videos
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
ETs are synthesized through a complex sequence of enzymatic steps, primarily involving an enzyme referred to as endothelin-converting enzyme...

