Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.5K
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

179
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
179
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

140
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
140
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Information Processing Approach01:30

Information Processing Approach

71
The information-processing theory of cognitive development centers on fundamental mental processes, including attention, memory, and problem-solving skills. Researchers in this field examine how cognitive abilities, such as working memory, evolve and influence children's overall development. Studies indicate that children with stronger working memory tend to excel in reading comprehension, math, and problem-solving compared to peers with less efficient memory skills. Low working memory is...
71

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The continuous dynamics of planning and acting in a virtually embodied task.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

No Central Executive? Decision Formation Through Multi-Area Population Dynamics.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Biomechanical costs influence decisions made during ongoing actions.

Journal of neurophysiology·2024
Same author

Integrated neural dynamics of sensorimotor decisions and actions.

PLoS biology·2022
Same author

Neuroscience needs evolution.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2021
Same author

Evolution of behavioural control from chordates to primates.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Parallel processing of value-related information during multi-attribute decisions.

Ayuno Nakahashi1, Paul Cisek1

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, SNC, UNIQUE, and CIRCA research groups, University of Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Journal of Neurophysiology
|September 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Humans don't always integrate all information for decisions. Instead, parallel processes allow attributes to compete, influencing choices and reaction times, especially when information conflicts.

Keywords:
change of minddecision-makinghumanmulti-attributeresponse conflict

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

757
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

757
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Decision Science
  • Human Behavior

Background:

  • Decisions involving multiple attributes raise questions about integration versus parallel processing.
  • Understanding how independent sensory features, conveying the same decision factor like reward value, interact is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether humans integrate all attributes into a unified measure or use parallel attribute-level comparisons.
  • To examine how independent sensory features (brightness and orientation) influence value-based decisions and reaction times.

Main Methods:

  • Human participants performed a two-alternative forced choice reaching task.
  • Target reward value was indicated by two visual attributes: brightness (bottom-up feature) and orientation (top-down feature).
  • Reaction times (RTs) were analyzed based on attribute congruency and choice.

Main Results:

  • Reaction times varied based on attribute combinations, contradicting a single integrated value model.
  • RTs were shortest for congruent attributes or when choices favored the bottom-up feature.
  • In conflict trials, participants often favored the bottom-up feature, and some exhibited mid-reach changes-of-mind from bottom-up to top-down.

Conclusions:

  • Multi-attribute value-based decisions are better explained by distributed competition among features, not a single integrated estimate.
  • Humans may 'jump the gun' using partial information, with early decisions influenced by fast bottom-up cues, potentially corrected by slower top-down information.