Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

07:43
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
3.1K
Patient-specific QA for the HyperArc technique using gafchromic film with multiple calibration methods
Qiuyi Xu1, Gauti Baldvinsson1, Naveed Zahoor Piracha1
1Department of Radiotherapy, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
|September 6, 2023
Summary
Three calibration methods for EBT-XD films were evaluated for stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) pre-treatment verification. All methods achieved high accuracy, with specific approaches showing advantages for single or multiple targets, ensuring precise patient-specific quality assurance.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy Technology
- Dosimetry
Background:
- Accurate pre-treatment verification is crucial for stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) to ensure patient safety and treatment efficacy.
- EBT-XD films are widely used for patient-specific quality assurance (QA) in radiotherapy, but require precise calibration.
- The HyperArc (HA) technique offers advanced capabilities for SRT, necessitating robust verification methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare three distinct calibration methods for EBT-XD films.
- To develop a precise pre-treatment verification protocol for SRT patients treated with the HyperArc technique.
- To assess the accuracy and reliability of EBT-XD film dosimetry for patient-specific QA.
Main Methods:
- EBT-XD films were calibrated using manual, EDW, and PDD calibration approaches.
- Films were digitized using an Epson V850 Pro scanner under a local scanning protocol.
- Patient-specific QA films were irradiated in phantoms and analyzed using gamma analysis to compare film-derived doses with treatment planning system (TPS) calculations.
Main Results:
- Scan-to-scan variation was minimal (≤ 0.2%), and calibration curve accuracy showed deviations ≤ 3% from delivered doses.
- All calibration methods achieved gamma passing rates >94% with clinically relevant criteria.
- EDW calibration showed higher gamma passing rates for single targets (99% ± 1.2%), while PDD calibration improved agreement for multiple targets (99.3% ± 0.8%).
Conclusions:
- The evaluated manual, EDW, and PDD calibration methods are validated for EBT-XD films.
- These methods provide accurate calibration curves essential for pre-treatment patient-specific QA in SRT.
- The study confirms the utility of EBT-XD films for precise dosimetry in advanced radiotherapy techniques like HyperArc.

