Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Developing a stochastic hydrological model for informing lake water level drawdown management.
Xinchen He1, Konstantinos Andreadis1, Allison H Roy2
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts, 130 Natural Resources Rd, Amherst, 01003, MA, USA.
Winter drawdown (WD) management can be challenging. A new hydrological model (HMF-Lake) helps assess probabilities for meeting drawdown and refill targets, aiding lake managers in following state guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Hydrology
- Water Resource Management
- Limnology
Background:
- Winter drawdown (WD) is a common lake management practice for flood control, vegetation reduction, and infrastructure maintenance.
- Regulatory guidelines exist for WD timing and magnitude, but uncertainties in lake characteristics and hydrometeorology complicate target achievement.
- Modeling tools are essential for assessing the feasibility of meeting WD management targets.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a hydrological modeling framework for lake water level drawdown management (HMF-Lake).
- To assess the ability of 15 Massachusetts lakes to meet state WD guidelines using stochastic simulations.
- To provide quantitative insights for lake managers regarding WD strategy feasibility.
Main Methods:
- Developed the HMF-Lake hydrological modeling framework based on daily lake water balance.
- Simulated inflows using the Cemaneige-GR4J rainfall-runoff model and calculated outflows using a modified Target Storage and Release Based Method (TSRB).
- Employed stochastic model executions to assess probabilities of meeting WD guidelines (drawdown by Dec 1, refill by Apr 1) for various drawdown magnitudes.
Main Results:
- The HMF-Lake model showed satisfactory performance in simulating historical lake water levels (NSE: 0.53–0.86).
- Stochastic analysis indicated that most lakes could not achieve a drawdown of 3 ft or more by Dec 1.
- Starting refills in March was feasible for most lakes to achieve a 95% probability of full refill by Apr 1 for drawdowns up to 6 ft.
Conclusions:
- The HMF-Lake model provides a quantitative tool for lake managers to understand WD feasibility against state guidelines.
- The model can support systematic evaluation of WD strategies at state or regional scales.
- Findings aid adaptive WD management, especially under changing climate conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Creating a Hydraulic Model of a Dam Spillway
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Typical Model Studies
Modeling and Similitude
Conservation of Mass in Moving, Nondeforming Control Volume
In the context of a detention basin, the conservation of mass states that the total mass of water entering the basin must equal the mass leaving the basin plus any accumulation of...
Rapidly Varying Flow

