Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025
Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Paramedic recognition of posterior circulation stroke: a vignette and focus group study
1National Ambulance Service, Ireland; University College Dublin ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3528-769X.
Introduction:
The main pre-hospital screening tool used for stroke in Ireland and the United Kingdom is the FAST (face, arms, speech, time) test. However, posterior circulation stroke (PCS) patients may be FAST negative on exam, presenting with sudden dizziness, headaches, visual problems, nausea and vomiting and balance/co-ordination problems. There is a lack of research into paramedic recognition of PCS, and this study sought to evaluate recognition rates among paramedics (Ps) and advanced paramedics (APs) in Ireland.
Methods:
A cross-sectional sequential exploratory design was chosen. An anonymous online survey was carried out, which informed focus group discussions. The survey contained six clinical vignettes, two of which were PCS presentations. Correct diagnosis, hospital destination and type of pre-alert were recorded. Focus groups were chaired by an independent moderator via Zoom. Recordings were transcribed and thematic analysis was carried out to create codes and themes.
Results:
One hundred and fifty-one staff members (91 Ps, 60 APs) completed the survey (response rate 40%). Of these, 67% did not recognise PCS symptoms and 77% did not choose to transport to a stroke unit. For those correctly suspecting PCS, 42% requested resus at the stroke unit and 18% requested resus in the local emergency department (ED). Two focus groups of four practitioners (n = 8) took place. Three main themes were created: (1) comfort levels with posterior stroke, with subthemes of recognition and personal experiences; (2) education, with subthemes of clinical practice guideline (CPG) issues and training issues; and (3) hospital factors, with subthemes of pre-alerting and disconnect between hospital and emergency medical services. Participants were uncomfortable with PCS recognition and bypassing their local ED. More training was called for, with a dedicated CPG. Relationships with hospital staff affected willingness to pre-alert.
Conclusions:
In this sample group, recognition of PCS and onward transfer to a stroke unit was low. Focus groups showed that practitioners were uncomfortable recognising PCS and bypassing a local ED without adequate training and a dedicated CPG. Relationships with hospital staff also affected pre-alert decisions.
