Risk of Stroke Recurrence After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Annika Nordanstig1, Thomas Gu2, Alexander Henze3
1Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Insights
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) does not alter the risk of recurrent stroke before carotid procedures in patients with severe stenosis. While IVT may slightly increase immediate risk, this is offset by a reduced risk later in the first week.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Symptomatic severe carotid stenosis poses a significant risk of cerebrovascular events.
- Carotid revascularization (surgery or stenting) is a common treatment for severe carotid stenosis.
- The role of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in managing patients awaiting carotid revascularization is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of IVT on the risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events before carotid intervention.
- To compare the incidence of preoperative ischemic stroke or retinal artery occlusion in IVT-treated versus non-IVT-treated patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.
Main Methods:
- A merged cohort analysis of three patient groups with symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis.
- Exclusion of patients not presenting with stroke on the day of symptom onset to ensure cohort relevance.
- Comparison of preoperative cerebrovascular event risk up to 30 days between IVT-treated and non-IVT-treated cohorts.
Main Results:
- 64 out of 316 patients received IVT; no significant difference in recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke or retinal artery occlusion risk at 7 and 30 days.
- A trend towards higher immediate risk (day 0) in the IVT group (6% vs. 1%) was observed, though not statistically significant after adjustment.
- This initial risk increase was offset by a subsequent risk decrease, resulting in no significant difference by day 7.
Conclusions:
- IVT does not appear to significantly affect the overall risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis awaiting intervention.
- Both IVT-treated and non-IVT-treated patients face a substantial risk of recurrent events.
- A potential transient increase in risk on the day of IVT administration may be counterbalanced by a decreased risk in the following days.
Objective:
To assess if intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) affects the risk of recurrent preoperative cerebrovascular events before carotid surgery or stenting in patients with symptomatic ≥ 50% carotid stenosis.
Methods:
Three cohorts of symptomatic ≥ 50% carotid stenosis patients were merged. To make the control group relevant, we excluded patients not presenting with stroke on the day of symptom onset. The risk of preoperative cerebrovascular events up to 30 days was compared between the IVT-treated and non-IVT-treated.
Results:
In total, 316 patients were included, 64 (20%) treated with IVT. Those treated with IVT had similar risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke or retinal artery occlusion (12% at day 7, 12% at day 30) as those not treated (9% at day 7, 15% at day 30; adjusted HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.4-2.2). There was a tendency (p = 0.09) towards time-dependency in the data where the recurrence risk was higher in IVT-treated at day 0 (6% in IVT-treated, 1% in non-IVT-treated, OR 5.5, 95% CI 1.2-25.4, p = 0.03). This was not significant when adjusting for co-factors (adjusted OR 4.4, 95% CI 0.9-21.8, p = 0.07) and was offset by a later risk decrease, with no remaining risk difference between IVT-treated and non-IVT-treated at day 7.
Conclusions:
Intravenous thrombolysis treatment does not seem to affect the risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis: The risk is high in both IVT-treated and non-IVT-treated. However, there might be a risk increase on the day of IVT treatment that is offset by a risk decrease during the first week.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

