Risk of Stroke Recurrence After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Annika Nordanstig1, Thomas Gu2, Alexander Henze3

  • 1Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Insights

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) does not alter the risk of recurrent stroke before carotid procedures in patients with severe stenosis. While IVT may slightly increase immediate risk, this is offset by a reduced risk later in the first week.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Symptomatic severe carotid stenosis poses a significant risk of cerebrovascular events.
  • Carotid revascularization (surgery or stenting) is a common treatment for severe carotid stenosis.
  • The role of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in managing patients awaiting carotid revascularization is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of IVT on the risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events before carotid intervention.
  • To compare the incidence of preoperative ischemic stroke or retinal artery occlusion in IVT-treated versus non-IVT-treated patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Main Methods:

  • A merged cohort analysis of three patient groups with symptomatic ≥50% carotid stenosis.
  • Exclusion of patients not presenting with stroke on the day of symptom onset to ensure cohort relevance.
  • Comparison of preoperative cerebrovascular event risk up to 30 days between IVT-treated and non-IVT-treated cohorts.

Main Results:

  • 64 out of 316 patients received IVT; no significant difference in recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke or retinal artery occlusion risk at 7 and 30 days.
  • A trend towards higher immediate risk (day 0) in the IVT group (6% vs. 1%) was observed, though not statistically significant after adjustment.
  • This initial risk increase was offset by a subsequent risk decrease, resulting in no significant difference by day 7.

Conclusions:

  • IVT does not appear to significantly affect the overall risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis awaiting intervention.
  • Both IVT-treated and non-IVT-treated patients face a substantial risk of recurrent events.
  • A potential transient increase in risk on the day of IVT administration may be counterbalanced by a decreased risk in the following days.
Abstract