Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2025

07:34
Fetal Mouse Cardiovascular Imaging Using a High-frequency Ultrasound 30/45MHZ System
Published on: May 5, 2018
11.7K
A machine learning model for predicting congenital heart defects from administrative data.
Haoming Shi1, Wendy Book2,3, Cheryl Raskind-Hood3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Birth Defects Research
|September 8, 2023
Summary
Machine learning (ML) algorithms significantly improve the accuracy of identifying congenital heart defects (CHD) in administrative data compared to International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes alone. This enhances public health surveillance for CHD patients.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Public Health
- Machine Learning
Background:
- International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes are commonly used for identifying congenital heart defects (CHD) in administrative data.
- However, ICD codes may inaccurately identify true positive (TP) individuals with CHD, potentially weakening surveillance efforts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To enhance CHD surveillance by accurately identifying TP CHD cases in administrative records using machine learning (ML) algorithms.
- To identify key features that predict TP CHD individuals within large administrative datasets.
Main Methods:
- Applied traditional ML models (Logistic Regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Random Forest, XGBoost) to a validated dataset of 779 patients.
- Utilized encounter-level data including ICD-9-CM and CPT codes from 2011-2013 across four US sites.
- Employed five-fold cross-validation to identify overlapping important features and compared model performance using metrics like PPV and F1-score.
Main Results:
- Expert clinician validation of ICD-9-CM CHD codes yielded a baseline positive predictive value (PPV) of 76.5%.
- ML feature selection reduced 7138 features to 10, significantly improving prediction of TP CHD cases.
- eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) demonstrated superior performance, achieving a median PPV of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.95) and F1-score of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.91).
Conclusions:
- ML algorithms substantially improve the accuracy of identifying TP CHD cases compared to using ICD codes alone.
- This ML approach enhances the generalizability of findings from large datasets to the CHD patient population.
- Improved identification accuracy strengthens public health surveillance for congenital heart defects.

